An updated pGREEN-based vector suite for cost-effective cloning in plant molecular biology.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Catch & Release-rapid cost-effective protein purification from plants using a DIY GFP-Trap-protease approach.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
   Article
2. Probing the physiological role of the plastid outer-envelope membrane using the oemiR plasmid collection.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023
   Article
3. The Arabidopsis T-DNA mutant SALK_008491 carries a 14-kb deletion on chromosome 3 that provides rare insights into the plant response to dynamic light stress.Plant direct · 2022
   Article
4. Two plastid POLLUX ion channel-like proteins are required for stress-triggered stromal Ca2+release.Plant physiology · 2021
   Article
5. Characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.