Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33274301›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2020

Programme theory and linked intervention strategy for large-scale change to improve hospital care in a low and middle-income country - A Study Pre-Protocol.

Mike English, Jacinta Nzinga, Grace Irimu, David Gathara, Jalemba Aluvaala, Jacob McKnight, Geoffrey Wong, Sassy Molyneux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The social networks of hospital staff: A realist synthesis.Journal of health services research & policy · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mike EnglishHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7427-0826
Jacinta NzingaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Grace IrimuHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
David GatharaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jalemba AluvaalaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0851-3711
Jacob McKnightCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Geoffrey WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sassy MolyneuxHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In low and middle-income countries (LMIC) general hospitals are important for delivering some key acute care services. Neonatal care is emblematic of these acute services as averting deaths requires skilled care over many days from multiple professionals with at least basic equipment. However, hospital care is often of poor quality and large-scale change is needed to improve outcomes. In this manuscript we aim to show how we have drawn upon our understanding of contexts of care in Kenyan general hospital NBUs, and on social and behavioural theories that offer potential mechanisms of change in these settings, to develop an initial programme theory guiding a large scale change intervention to improve neonatal care and outcomes.  Our programme theory is an expression of our assumptions about what actions will be both useful and feasible.  It incorporates a recognition of our strengths and limitations as a research-practitioner partnership to influence change. The steps we employ represent the initial programme theory development phase commonly undertaken in many Realist Evaluations. However, unlike many Realist Evaluations that develop initial programme theories focused on pre-existing interventions or programmes, our programme theory informs the design of a new intervention that we plan to execute. Within this paper we articulate briefly how we propose to operationalise this new intervention. Finally, we outline the quantitative and qualitative research activities that we will use to address specific questions related to the delivery and effects of this new intervention, discussing some of the challenges of such study designs. We intend that this research on the intervention will inform future efforts to revise the programme theory and yield transferable learning.

Indexed as

EvaluationHealth SystemsHospitalNeonatal CareQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID33274301
PMCPMC7684682.2

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.