ArticleBioMed research international2020
Application Value of SAT-TB Combined with Acid-Fast Staining in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Application Value of SAT-TB Combined with Acid-Fast Staining in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.BioMed research international · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of five etiological detecting techniques for the positive rates in the diagnosis of tuberculous granuloma.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2023Article
- The Diagnostic Value of the Thermostatic Amplification of Ribonucleic Acid in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Smear-Negative Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- ComparingInfection and drug resistance · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-03-20Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study is aimed at evaluating the clinical application value of RNA simultaneous amplification and testing method for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (SAT-TB) combined with acid-fast staining in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB).
methodsThis paper included 168 suspected and confirmed PTB sufferers admitted to The Sixth People's Hospital of Wenzhou from December 2018 to December 2019, whose sputum was collected and tested using SAT-TB, smear acid-fast staining method, and the BACTEC MGIT 960 system. With the MGIT 960 culture test method as the gold standard, the application value of SAT-TB, acid-fast staining, or SAT-TB combined with acid-fast staining in the diagnosis and treatment of PTB was assessed.
resultsWith the MGIT 960 culture as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of SAT-TB for the diagnosis of PTB were 57.3%, 92.5%, 84.3%, and 73.5%, respectively. The conformity was 76.8%, and the Kappa value was 0.515, suggesting a statistically significant difference (
conclusionSAT-TB combined with acid-fast staining had a similar detection rate to that of the MGIT 960 culture test with a high consistency degree, which could be applied in the diagnosis of PTB efficiently and accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.