Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33274197›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Selected Tools for Assessing the Risk of Falls in Older Women.

Patrycja Bobowik, Ida Wiszomirska, Anna Leś, Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrycja BobowikFaculty of Rehabilitation, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0166-3810
Ida WiszomirskaFaculty of Rehabilitation, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5838-601X
Anna LeśFaculty of Physical Education, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna KaczmarczykFaculty of Rehabilitation, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsFifty-five females were examined (May 2018-June 2019). Stabilographic examinations were performed with eyes open (EO) and closed (EC). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Spearman rank correlation were performed to determine the relationships and differences between the above tests.

resultsThe results of the TUG correlate with the overall stability index (OSI) EO (

conclusionsThe modified Unterberger test and TUG can be considered effective in functional FR assessment in older women. Using at least two different functional tests may improve the assessment of FR.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID33274197
PMCPMC7683108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.