ArticleCureus2020
Glycated Haemoglobin and Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Type Two Diabetic Patients in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemoglobin A1c association patterns with cardiovascular outcomes among patients with diabetes mellitus following percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review.Diabetes & vascular disease researchPooled it
- Hemoglobin AFuture cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is a marker that reflects the control of diabetes mellitus (DM) over a three-month period. We sought to compare cardiovascular outcomes of diabetic patients with and without controlled levels of HbA1c post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) presenting to King Faisal Cardiac Center. Methods: A retrospective single-center study of all patients with type two DM who were treated with PCI during the period between January 2015 and January 2018. All data were obtained from health informatics system. Demographics, clinical data, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were collected to compare outcomes among diabetic patients with and without controlled HbA1c.
resultsThe study included 177 patients with type two DM who underwent PCI. The mean age was 63.3 (SD±12). Males represented 73.4% and 26.6% were females. The mean HbA1c on admission was 8.7%. At presentation 31% of the patients had relatively controlled blood sugar (HbA1c mean 7.5%, SD±0.5) and 69% presented with poorly controlled type two DM (mean HbA1c 9.1%, SD±0.25). The prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidaemia were higher among the uncontrolled group, but there were no differences between both groups in the control of blood pressure or dyslipidaemia. Patients in the uncontrolled group had higher rate of prior PCI (36.6%) compared to the controlled arm (16%, p=0.0195) The prevalence of cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, and renal impairment was similar. The use of insulin was higher among the uncontrolled arm. Patients in the controlled arm had lower incidence of composite endpoints of death and non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke (MACCE) (14% vs 41%, p=0.001) compared to the uncontrolled arm.
conclusionAmong patients with type two DM that were treated with PCI, achieving targets of blood sugar control reflected by glycated haemoglobin is associated with improved survival and lower incidence of composite MACCE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.