ArticleSurgical neurology international2020
Endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy: How to decrease the learning curve.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational Cohort Study in Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Good Patient Outcomes Despite Learning Curve.International journal of spine surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical application of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative diseases: a multi-center study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Polytomous Rasch Analyses of Surgeons' Decision-Making on Choice of Procedure in Endoscopic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Decompression Surgeries.International journal of spine surgery · 2024Article
- Reducing the learning curve of interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy: mushroom model-simulation training.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023Article
- Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Review of Current Research.International journal of spine surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHerniated lumbar disc is a common cause of lumbosacral pain. Endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (ILD) is a well-established technique that provided comparable results to micro-discectomy. The aim of the study is to describe the learning curve of endoscopic ILD and explore measures that could improve effectiveness and decrease blood loss and operative time with accumulation of reasonable experience.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 65 patients presenting with symptomatic herniated lumbar disc who underwent endoscopic ILD. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I (standard technique) and Group II (modified technique). Collected data included patients' age, gender, preoperative manifestations, visual analog score (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disc level, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, and follow-up data at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Primary outcomes included total operative time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, and post-operative improvement in pain. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative complications, rate of conversion to open surgery, and recurrence.
resultsPost-operative VAS and ODI improved significantly in both groups. Mean total surgical time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly lower in Group II compared to Group I (
conclusionThe learning curve of endoscopic ILD was shallow with standard technique, indicating difficulties in mastering the procedure. The proposed modified technique helped reaching the required level of proficiency in the early phase of the curve, providing a significant reduction in operative time and blood loss, with comparable effectiveness and safety as the standard technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.