Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33274037›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2020

Placenta percreta - a management dilemma: an institutional experience and review of the literature

Kavita Khoiwal, Amrita Gaurav, Dhriti Kapur, Om Kumari, Pankaj Sharma, Rekha Bhandari, Jaya Chaturvedi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kavita KhoiwalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IndiaORCID 0000-0002-3156-7486
Amrita GauravDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IndiaORCID 0000-0002-8672-2463
Dhriti KapurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IndiaORCID 0000-0002-7210-0188
Om KumariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IndiaORCID 0000-0002-7223-635X
Pankaj SharmaDepartment of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IndiaORCID 0000-0003-4088-1554
Rekha BhandariDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IndiaORCID 0000-0001-7346-6045
Jaya ChaturvediDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IndiaORCID 0000-0003-1222-4565
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Placenta percreta is an extremely high-risk obstetric condition often associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality. To date, there is no consensus on its management. This article aimed to identify an optimum management option to improve maternal outcomes in patients with placenta percreta. Material and Methods: This was an observational study conducted at a tertiary care institute from October 2019 to June 2020. A well-defined plan of preoperative, bilateral, uterine artery catheter placement, cesarean delivery (CD) of the baby followed by uterine artery embolization (UAE), and elective delayed hysterectomy after 2-4 weeks, was made by a multidisciplinary team. Demographic variables such as age, parity, period of gestation, presenting complaints, imaging findings, mode of management, intraoperative findings, blood loss, the requirement for blood and blood products, and complications were noted. Results: We encountered seven cases of placenta percreta over a period of nine months. UAE was performed in 6/7 patients. UAE was not performed in one patient as she presented to the emergency department in shock. Elective delayed hysterectomy was performed after 2-4 weeks in three patients, three patients required emergency hysterectomy (two during CD and one on the seventh postoperative day) and one patient was managed conservatively by leaving the placenta in situ after CD and UAE. Patients who underwent UAE had notably less intraoperative blood loss and requirement of blood and blood products than the patient who could not receive UAE. During cesarean hysterectomy, blood loss was 1,700 mL in embolized (case 4) vs 3,000 mL in unembolized patient (case 7). In embolized patients, the median blood loss during CD (case 1,2,3,5,6) was 200 mL (interquartile range: 165-200 mL) and during delayed elective hysterectomy (case 1,3,5) was 150 mL (range: 125-225 mL). Blood loss in case 2 was 1,000 mL during emergency hysterectomy on the 7 Conclusion: Placenta percreta, if not managed in a preplanned manner, may lead to disastrous maternal outcomes. Prophylactic devascularization during CD and leaving the placenta in situ followed by elective delayed hysterectomy, might be a reasonable management option in most severe cases of placenta percreta.

Indexed as

elective delayed hysterectomyimmediate cesarean hysterectomyPlacenta percretauterine artery embolization

Identifiers

PMID33274037
PMCPMC7726456
OpenAlexW3107811968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.