Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33274021›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2020

When to Use a Condylar Constrained Insert in Non-Stemmed Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Satit Thiengwittayaporn, Natthapong Hongku, Umaporn Uawisetwathana, Pichai Sansawat

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ATK 1Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Satit ThiengwittayapornDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natthapong HongkuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Umaporn UawisetwathanaNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Pichai SansawatDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Navamindradhiraj University · THNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · THVajira Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroudThe constrained insert with non-stemmed tibial and femoral components can be used in the modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when soft-tissue balance and adequate stability from a posterior-stabilized (PS) insert cannot be achieved. This study aimed to identify the prevalence and predictive factors associated with the constrained insert use during primary TKA for varus deformity.

methodsFrom August 2016 to March 2019, 554 primary TKAs were consecutively performed by one surgeon. The choice of using a conventional PS polyethylene insert versus a constrained insert was made by the surgeon, depending on the stability detected after an attempt to balance the soft tissue. The decision to convert to a constrained liner was made if the ligament could not be balanced, if flexion-extension gaps were mismatched, or if the varus-valgus opening was 3 mm or more when varus and valgus stress tests at 0° were applied. We retrospectively investigated the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors associated with the constrained insert use. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictive factors of constrained insert use, and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to pinpoint a cutoff value of tibiofemoral varus angle.

resultsConstrained inserts were used in 130 of 497 varus knees (26.1%). A multivariate analysis revealed that the factors associated with an increased adjusted risk of constrained insert use included preoperative severe varus deformity (odds ratio [OR], 5.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.75-12.16;

conclusionsPrevalence of 26.1% for constrained insert use was found in this study. Preoperative anatomic tibiofemoral varus angle of > 19.8° and severe release of soft tissue through the superficial medial collateral ligament were associated with the use of a constrained articulation. The findings from this study will help surgeons to improve efficiency of surgical sequence planning and provide counseling to patients regarding the associated cost.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingKnee ProsthesisProsthesis DesignAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesPosterior-stabilizedTotal knee arthroplastyVarusVarus-valgus constrained prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID33274021
PMCPMC7683185
OpenAlexW3041677248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.