ArticleCancer management and research2020
Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Superficial Esophageal Cancer Using a Pattern Recognition Neural Network.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- CT-based radiomics for predicting lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Accuracy of machine learning in detecting lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- AI in esophageal cancer: advances, barriers to clinical translation, and perspectives for digital health.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a CT radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of right recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Prediction of lymph node metastasis in early esophageal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- The Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Digestive System Neoplasms: A Review.Health data science · 2023Review
- Global research trends of artificial intelligence applied in esophageal carcinoma: A bibliometric analysis (2000-2022)Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Machine learning models predict lymph node metastasis in patients with stage T1-T2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A novel web-based dynamic nomogram for recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background or purposeIt is important to predict nodal metastases in patients with early esophageal cancer to stratify patients for endoscopic resection or esophagectomy. This study was to establish a novel artificial neural network (ANN) and assess its ability by comparing it with a traditional logistic regression (LR) model for predicting lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC).
methodsA primary cohort was established, composed of 733 patients who underwent esophagectomy for SESCC from December 2012 to December 2019. The following steps were applied: (i) predictor selection; (ii) development of an ANN and a LR model, respectively; (iii) cross-validation; and (iv) evaluation of performance between the two models. The diagnostic assessment was performed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, C-index, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).
resultsThe established ANN model had 6 significant predictors: a past habit of alcohol taking, tumor size, submucosal invasion, histologic grade, lymph-vessel invasion, and preoperative CT result. The ANN model performed better than the LR model in specificity (91.20% vs 72.59%, p=0.006), PPV (56.49% vs 39.78%, p=0.020), accuracy (90.72% vs 74.49%, p<0.0001), C-index (91.5% vs 86.8%, p<0.001), and IDI (improved by 23.3%, p<0.001). There were no differences between these two models in sensitivity (87.06% vs 83.21%, p=0.764), NPV (98.17% vs 95.21%, p=0.627), and NRI (improved by -1.1%, p=0.824).
conclusionThis ANN model is superior to the LR model and may become a valuable tool for the prediction of LN metastasis in patients with SESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.