ArticleMolecular vision2020
A mutation in
Article in Molecular vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Genetic Variants and Clinical Profiles in Peters Anomaly Spectrum Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The conserved protein DopA is required for growth, drug tolerance and virulence in Aspergillus fumigatus.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Article
- Genetic Aspects of Glaucoma: An Updated Review.Current molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Peters anomaly (PA) is a heterogeneous developmental disorder characterized by central corneal opacity and iridocorneal or corneolenticular adhesions. Although many causative genes have been identified, most screened patients do not have mutations in the known genes. We aimed to identify the genetic cause of Peters anomaly in a pedigree with three affected individuals. Methods: Slit-lamp biomicroscopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy were performed for definitive diagnosis. Exome sequencing was conducted on the DNA of all three patients. After identification of a candidate causative gene, expression of the gene was assessed with real-time PCR in various ocular tissues of three human embryos and three adults. Results: The patients were affected with isolated PA. The parents of the patients were related to one another. Inheritance of PA was autosomal recessive. After appropriate filtering of the exome data, a homozygous variation in Conclusions:
Indexed as
Identifiers
33273802PMC7700884W3108287622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.