ArticleScientific reports2020
Cyclic on-chip bacteria separation and preconcentration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Microfluidics-Based Monitoring of Waterborne Pathogens: From Isolation to Detection.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Periodic Flows in Microfluidics.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Review
- Deep multilevel wet etching of fused silica glass microstructures in BOE solution.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Rapid on-site nucleic acid testing: On-chip sample preparation, amplification, and detection, and their integration into all-in-one systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoparticles and biological molecules high throughput robust separation is of significant interest in many healthcare and nanoscience industrial applications. In this work, we report an on-chip automatic efficient separation and preconcentration method of dissimilar sized particles within a microfluidic platform using integrated membrane valves controlled microfiltration. Micro-sized E. coli bacteria are sorted from nanoparticles and preconcentrated on a microfluidic chip with six integrated pneumatic valves (sub-100 nL dead volume) using hydrophilic PVDF filter with 0.45 μm pore diameter. The proposed on-chip automatic sorting sequence includes a sample filtration, dead volume washout and retentate backflush in reverse flow. We showed that pulse backflush mode and volume control can dramatically increase microparticles sorting and preconcentration efficiency. We demonstrate that at the optimal pulse backflush regime a separation efficiency of E. coli cells up to 81.33% at a separation throughput of 120.45 μL/min can be achieved. A trimmed mode when the backflush volume is twice smaller than the initial sample results in a preconcentration efficiency of E. coli cells up to 121.96% at a throughput of 80.93 μL/min. Finally, we propose a cyclic on-chip preconcentration method which demonstrates E. coli cells preconcentration efficiency of 536% at a throughput of 1.98 μL/min and 294% preconcentration efficiency at a 10.9 μL/min throughput.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.