Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33273682›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2021

CXCR4 in Waldenström's Macroglobulinema: chances and challenges.

Lisa Marie Kaiser, Zachary R Hunter, Steven P Treon, Christian Buske

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A genetic profiling guideline to support diagnosis and clinical management of lymphomas.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Direction of Modern Therapies in Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Simplified Risk Stratification Model for Patients With Waldenström Macroglobulinemia.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa Marie KaiserInstitute of Experimental Cancer Research, CCC and University Hospital Ulm, Germany, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Zachary R HunterBing Center for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-1691
Steven P TreonBing Center for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Christian BuskeInstitute of Experimental Cancer Research, CCC and University Hospital Ulm, Germany, 89081, Ulm, Germany. christian.buske@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9782-9012
Harvard University · USUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) SFB 1279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is one of the major aims in cancer research to improve our understanding of the underlying mechanisms which initiate and maintain tumor growth and to translate these findings into novel clinical diagnostic and therapeutic concepts with the ultimate goal to improve patient care. One of the greater success stories in this respect has been Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM), which is an incurable B-cell neoplasm characterized by serum monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM) and clonal lymphoplasmacytic cells infiltrating the bone marrow. Recent years have succeeded to describe the molecular landscape of WM in detail, highlighting two recurrently mutated genes, the MYD88 and the CXCR4 genes: MYD88 with an almost constant and recurrent point mutation present in over 90% of patients and CXCR4 with over 40 different mutations in the coding region affecting up to 40% of patients. Intriguingly, both mutations are activating mutations leading in the case of CXCR4 to an indelible activation and perpetual signaling of the chemokine receptor. These data have shed light on the essential role of CXCR4 in this disease and have paved the way to use these findings for predicting treatment response to the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib and novel therapeutic approaches in WM, which might be transferable to other related CXCR4 positive diseases. Well known for its central role in cancer progression and distribution, CXCR4 is highlighted in this review with regard to its biology, prognostic and predictive relevance and therapeutic implications in WM.

Indexed as

Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAnimalsHumansReceptors, CXCR4Signal TransductionWaldenstrom MacroglobulinemiaAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseCXCR4 protein, humanReceptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

PMID33273682
PMCPMC7862063
OpenAlexW3108826455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.