ArticleScientific reports2020
Linking diverse salinity responses of 14 almond rootstocks with physiological, biochemical, and genetic determinants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alfalfa MsSOS2 confers salinity tolerance by promoting lateral root growth and regulating NaScientific reports · 2025Article
- Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from yam leaves: characterisation and in vitro efficacy against three phytopathogenic bacteria.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Article
- Silicon-induced mitigation of salt stress in GF677 and GN15 rootstocks: insights into physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Rootstock Breeding of Stone Fruits Under Modern Cultivation Regime: Current Status and Perspectives.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Understanding the salt overly sensitive pathway in Prunus: Identification and characterization of NHX, CIPK, and CBL genes.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Strategies for combating plant salinity stress: the potential of plant growth-promoting microorganisms.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Fine-root and leaf acquisitive traits decoupled from chloride accumulation in reflecting the differential salinity tolerance amongFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Insight into Physiological and Biochemical Determinants of Salt Stress Tolerance in Tetraploid Citrus.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Morphological, physiological, biochemical, and transcriptome studies reveal the importance of transporters and stress signaling pathways during salinity stress in Prunus.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Linking genetic determinants with salinity tolerance and ion relationships in eggplant, tomato and pepper.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Morpho-Physiological, Biochemical, and Genetic Responses to Salinity inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fourteen commercial almond rootstocks were tested under five types of irrigation waters to understand the genetic, physiological, and biochemical bases of salt-tolerance mechanisms. Treatments included control (T1) and four saline water treatments dominant in sodium-sulfate (T2), sodium-chloride (T3), sodium-chloride/sulfate (T4), and calcium/magnesium-chloride/sulfate (T5). T3 caused the highest reduction in survival rate and trunk diameter, followed by T4 and T2, indicating that Na and, to a lesser extent, Cl were the most toxic ions to almond rootstocks. Peach hybrid (Empyrean 1) and peach-almond hybrids (Cornerstone, Bright's Hybrid 5, and BB 106) were the most tolerant to salinity. Rootstock's performance under salinity correlated highly with its leaf Na and Cl concentrations, indicating that Na
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.