Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33273642›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Layer-wise relevance propagation of InteractionNet explains protein-ligand interactions at the atom level.

Hyeoncheol Cho, Eok Kyun Lee, Insung S Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Building Explainable Graph Neural Network by Sparse Learning for the Drug-Protein Binding Prediction.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Analyzing Atomic Interactions in Molecules as Learned by Neural Networks.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploiting Molecular Dynamics in Composite Coatings to Design Robust Super-Repellent Surfaces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyeoncheol ChoDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Korea.
Eok Kyun LeeDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Korea. eklee@kaist.ac.kr.
Insung S ChoiDepartment of Chemistry, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Korea. ischoi@kaist.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of deep-learning models for intermolecular noncovalent (NC) interactions between proteins and ligands has great potential in the chemical and pharmaceutical tasks, including structure-activity relationship and drug design. It still remains an open question how to convert the three-dimensional, structural information of a protein-ligand complex into a graph representation in the graph neural networks (GNNs). It is also difficult to know whether a trained GNN model learns the NC interactions properly. Herein, we propose a GNN architecture that learns two distinct graphs-one for the intramolecular covalent bonds in a protein and a ligand, and the other for the intermolecular NC interactions between the protein and the ligand-separately by the corresponding covalent and NC convolutional layers. The graph separation has some advantages, such as independent evaluation on the contribution of each convolutional step to the prediction of dissociation constants, and facile analysis of graph-building strategies for the NC interactions. In addition to its prediction performance that is comparable to that of a state-of-the art model, the analysis with an explainability strategy of layer-wise relevance propagation shows that our model successfully predicts the important characteristics of the NC interactions, especially in the aspect of hydrogen bonding, in the chemical interpretation of protein-ligand binding.

Identifiers

PMID33273642
PMCPMC7713352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.