Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33273635›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Two GWAS-identified variants are associated with lumbar spinal stenosis and Gasdermin-C expression in Chinese population.

Hua Jiang, Abu Moro, Yang Liu, Jiaqi Wang, Dihua Meng, Xinli Zhan, Qingjun Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genetic predisposition ofCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Macrophages and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Pyroptosis, metabolism, and tumor immune microenvironment.Clinical and translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hua JiangDepartment of Spine and Osteopathic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Abu MoroDepartment of Spine and Osteopathic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Spine and Osteopathic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Jiaqi WangDepartment of Spine and Osteopathic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Dihua MengDepartment of Spine and Osteopathic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Xinli ZhanDepartment of Spine and Osteopathic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Qingjun WeiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, 530021, China. gxspine@163.com.
Guangxi Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the expression levels of genome-wide association studies (GWAS)-identified variants near Gasdermin-C (GSDMC) and its association with lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) in a Chinese population. In accordance with previously reported findings, our study involved the top 4 variants; rs6651255, rs7833174, rs4130415, and rs7816342. A total of 800 participants, 400 LDD patients and 400 controls were involved in the study. The LDD patients were divided into two mutually exclusive subgroups: subgroup 1: lumbar disc herniation; subgroup 2: lumbar spinal stenosis. Genotyping were performed using TaqMan assay, and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) used to measure the plasma GSDMC levels, while quantitative reverse-transcription (qRT)-PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were used to evaluate the GSDMC expression levels. Among the studied variants, there were no statistically significant differences in allelic and genotypic frequencies between LDD patients and their controls (all P > 0.05). However, the subgroup analysis revealed a significant association between rs6651255 and rs7833174 in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (subgroup 2). Furthermore, the max-statistic test revealed that the inheritance models of two variants of lumbar spinal stenosis were represented by the recessive model. The plasma and mRNA expression levels of GSDMC were significantly higher in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the CC genotypes of rs6651255 and rs7833174 were significantly associated with increased plasma expression levels of GSDMC in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (P < 0.01). Two GWAS-identified variants (rs6651255 and rs7833174) near GSDMC were associated with a predisposition to lumbar spinal stenosis. GSDMC protein and mRNA expression levels may have prognostic qualities as biomarkers for the existence, occurrence or development of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyAdolescentAdultAsian PeopleBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGasderminsGene FrequencyHumansIntervertebral Disc DegenerationIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeMaleBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsGasderminsGSDMC protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33273635
PMCPMC7713291
OpenAlexW3107163072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.