Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33273600›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Generation, analysis, and transformation of macro-chloroplast Potato (Solanum tuberosum) lines for chloroplast biotechnology.

Alessandro Occhialini, Alexander C Pfotenhauer, Taylor P Frazier, Li Li, Stacee A Harbison, Andrew J Lail, Zachary Mebane, Agnieszka A Piatek, Stephen B Rigoulot, Henry Daniell and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plastid engineering using episomal DNA.Plant cell reports · 2023
    Review
  5. Genome-Editing ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  7. Mini-synplastomes for plastid genetic engineering.Plant biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro OcchialiniDepartment of Food Science, University of Tennessee, 102 Food Safety and Processing Building, 2600 River Dr., Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1162-798X
Alexander C PfotenhauerDepartment of Food Science, University of Tennessee, 102 Food Safety and Processing Building, 2600 River Dr., Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5015-7765
Taylor P FrazierDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Li LiCenter for Agricultural Synthetic Biology (CASB), University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Stacee A HarbisonCenter for Agricultural Synthetic Biology (CASB), University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Andrew J LailCenter for Agricultural Synthetic Biology (CASB), University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6292-1601
Zachary MebaneDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Agnieszka A PiatekDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Stephen B RigoulotCenter for Agricultural Synthetic Biology (CASB), University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Henry DaniellDepartment of Basic and Translational Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
C Neal StewartCenter for Agricultural Synthetic Biology (CASB), University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3026-9193
Scott C LenaghanDepartment of Food Science, University of Tennessee, 102 Food Safety and Processing Building, 2600 River Dr., Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA. slenagha@utk.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7539-1726
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USLife Systems (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chloroplast biotechnology is a route for novel crop metabolic engineering. The potential bio-confinement of transgenes, the high protein expression and the possibility to organize genes into operons represent considerable advantages that make chloroplasts valuable targets in agricultural biotechnology. In the last 3 decades, chloroplast genomes from a few economically important crops have been successfully transformed. The main bottlenecks that prevent efficient transformation in a greater number of crops include the dearth of proven selectable marker gene-selection combinations and tissue culture methods for efficient regeneration of transplastomic plants. The prospects of increasing organelle size are attractive from several perspectives, including an increase in the surface area of potential targets. As a proof-of-concept, we generated Solanum tuberosum (potato) macro-chloroplast lines overexpressing the tubulin-like GTPase protein gene FtsZ1 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Macro-chloroplast lines exhibited delayed growth at anthesis; however, at the time of harvest there was no significant difference in height between macro-chloroplast and wild-type lines. Macro-chloroplasts were successfully transformed by biolistic DNA-delivery and efficiently regenerated into homoplasmic transplastomic lines. We also demonstrated that macro-chloroplasts accumulate the same amount of heterologous protein than wild-type organelles, confirming efficient usage in plastid engineering. Advantages and limitations of using enlarge compartments in chloroplast biotechnology are discussed.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyBiolisticsChloroplastsCrops, AgriculturalMicroscopy, FluorescencePlants, Genetically ModifiedSolanum tuberosumTransformation, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID33273600
PMCPMC7713401
OpenAlexW3110615068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.