ArticleScientific reports2020
Improve sample preparation process for miRNA isolation from the culture cells by using silica fiber membrane.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The current landscape of mRNA therapy and the strategies for mRNA purification and dsRNA removal.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Epitranscriptomic Stability-Variable Extents of N1-Methyladenosine to N6-Methyladenosine Conversion Under Different Experimental Conditions.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Comparison of Viral RNA Extraction Protocols for Senecavirus A and Classical Swine Fever Virus.Folia microbiologica · 2025Article
- Blood collection tube and RNA purification method recommendations for extracellular RNA transcriptome profiling.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Review on Viral RNA Extraction Strategies for Enhanced Molecular Diagnostics.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Use of a Novel Whole Blood Separation and Transport Device for Targeted and Untargeted Proteomics.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Intermittent lysis on a single paper-based device to extract exosomal nucleic acid biomarkers from biological samples for downstream analysis.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- Graphene Oxide/Nitrocellulose Non-Covalent Hybrid as Solid Phase for Oligo-DNA Extraction from Complex Medium.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Paper-Based Exosomal MicroRNA-21 Detection for Wound Monitoring: A Proof of Concept and Clinical Validation Trial Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Small noncoding RNA interactome capture reveals pervasive, carbon source-dependent tRNA engagement of yeast glycolytic enzymes.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Visible-light and near-infrared fluorescence and surface-enhanced Raman scattering point-of-care sensing and bio-imaging: a review.Chemical Society reviews · 2022Review
- Isolation of Cell-Free miRNA from Biological Fluids: Influencing Factors and Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical applications of miRNAs, the purity and quality of the testing samples are very critical, especially the obtained tissue sample volume is limited. If the extracted miRNAs are contaminated or different in quality before analysis, it will increase the variance of the analysis result and make the medical information judgment incorrect and cannot be portable. Herein, we improved the commercially extraction kit by realizing the fundamental mechanism and hoped to serve finding optimal procedures for increasing the recovery of miRNAs extracted from cultured cells. In the adsorption process, the factors, like increasing the ethanol concentration or adding Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.