Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33273118›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

A unified neurocomputational bilateral model of spoken language production in healthy participants and recovery in poststroke aphasia.

Ya-Ning Chang, Matthew A Lambon Ralph

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Right hemisphere language network plasticity in aphasia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Right Hemisphere Language Network Plasticity in Aphasia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Distinct but cooperating brain networks supporting semantic cognition.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. With childhood hemispherectomy, one hemisphere can support-but is suboptimal for-word and face recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ya-Ning ChangMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom Matt.Lambon-Ralph@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk yaning.chang@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5248-0761
Matthew A Lambon RalphMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom Matt.Lambon-Ralph@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk yaning.chang@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-2488
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the processes underlying normal, impaired, and recovered language performance has been a long-standing goal for cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Many verbally described hypotheses about language lateralization and recovery have been generated. However, they have not been considered within a single, unified, and implemented computational framework, and the literatures on healthy participants and patients are largely separated. These investigations also span different types of data, including behavioral results and functional MRI brain activations, which augment the challenge for any unified theory. Consequently, many key issues, apparent contradictions, and puzzles remain to be solved. We developed a neurocomputational, bilateral pathway model of spoken language production, designed to provide a unified framework to simulate different types of data from healthy participants and aphasic patients. The model encapsulates key computational principles (differential computational capacity, emergent division of labor across pathways, experience-dependent plasticity-related recovery) and provides an explanation for the bilateral yet asymmetric lateralization of language in healthy participants, chronic aphasia after left rather than right hemisphere lesions, and the basis of partial recovery in patients. The model provides a formal basis for understanding the relationship between behavioral performance and brain activation. The unified model is consistent with the degeneracy and variable neurodisplacement theories of language recovery, and adds computational insights to these hypotheses regarding the neural machinery underlying language processing and plasticity-related recovery following damage.

Indexed as

LanguageModels, NeurologicalAphasiaFunctional LateralityHealthy VolunteersHumansNeuroimagingRecovery of FunctionStrokebilateral language processinglanguage lateralizationlanguage recoveryneurocomputational modelingstroke aphasia

Identifiers

PMID33273118
PMCPMC7768768
OpenAlexW3107844919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.