Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33273020›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2021

Surgical ovarian suppression for adjuvant treatment in hormone receptor positive breast cancer in premenopausal patients.

Anton Oseledchyk, Mary L Gemignani, Qin C Zhou, Alexia Iasonos, Rahmi Elahjji, Zara Adamou, Noah Feit, Shari B Goldfarb, Kara Long Roche, Yukio Sonoda and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anton OseledchykRadiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mary L GemignaniBreast Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Qin C ZhouEpidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Alexia IasonosEpidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Rahmi ElahjjiGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Zara AdamouGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Noah FeitGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Shari B GoldfarbBreast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kara Long RocheGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Yukio SonodaGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Deborah J GoldfrankGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Dennis S ChiGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Sally S SabanGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Vance BroachGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Nadeem R Abu-RustumGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-1298
Jeanne CarterDepartment of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mario LeitaoGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Oliver ZivanovicGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA zivanovo@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOvarian suppression is recommended to complement endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with breast cancer and high-risk features. It can be achieved by either medical ovarian suppression or therapeutic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Our objective was to evaluate characteristics of patients with stage I-III hormone receptor positive primary breast cancer who underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at our institution. MATERIALS AND

methodsPremenopausal women with stage I-III hormone receptor positive primary breast cancer diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2014 were identified from a database. Patients with confirmed

resultsOf 2740 women identified, 2018 (74%) received endocrine treatment without ovarian ablation, 516 (19%) received endocrine treatment plus ovarian ablation, and 206 (7.5%) did not receive endocrine treatment. Among patients undergoing ovarian ablation 282/516 (55%) received medical ovarian suppression, while 234 (45%) underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. By univariate logistic analyses, predictors for ovarian ablation were younger age (OR 0.97), histology (other vs ductal: OR 0.23), lymph node involvement (OR 1.89), higher International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (stage II vs I: OR 1.48; stage III vs I: OR 2.86), higher grade (grade 3 vs 1: OR 3.41; grade 2 vs 1: OR 2.99), chemotherapy (OR 1.52), and more recent year of diagnosis (2014 vs 2010; OR 1.713). Only year of diagnosis, stage, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) treatment remained significant in the multivariate model. Within the cohort undergoing ovarian ablation, older age (OR 1.05) was associated with therapeutic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Of 234 undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 12 (5%) mild to moderate adverse surgical events were recorded.

conclusionsBilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is used frequently as an endocrine ablation strategy. Older age was associated with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Perioperative morbidity was acceptable. Evaluation of long-term effects and quality of life associated with endocrine ablation will help guide patient/provider decision-making.

Indexed as

PremenopauseAdultBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDatabases, FactualFemaleGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSalpingo-oophorectomyGonadotropin-Releasing Hormonegynecologic surgical proceduressurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID33273020
PMCPMC8409154
OpenAlexW3109350701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.