Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33272959›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2021

Non-surgical and surgical treatments for rotator cuff disease: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial with 2-year follow-up after initial rehabilitation.

Sanna Cederqvist, Tapio Flinkkilä, Markus Sormaala, Jari Ylinen, Hannu Kautiainen, Tero Irmola, Heidi Lehtokangas, Juho Liukkonen, Konsta Pamilo, Tero Ridanpää and 4 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00637013 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Operative Versus Non-operative Management of Subacromial Impingement

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Finland Hospital DistrictRan2008 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsSubacromial Impingement SyndromeArmsAcromioplasty, Physiotherapy
NCT00695981 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Operative and Non-operative Management of Rotator Cuff Tear

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Finland Hospital DistrictRan2008 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsRotator Cuff TearArmsRotator cuff repair, Conservative treatment
NCT06603168 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Autonomic Recalibration Approach to Myofascial Pain Elimination

TypeinterventionalSponsorEdward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic MedicineRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsChronic Pain (Back / Neck), Autonomic DysregulationArmsAutonomic Recalibration Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. [Interpretation of the 2025 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) on Management of Rotator Cuff Injuries Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Sanna CederqvistDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland sanna.cederqvist@icloud.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5060-4641
Tapio FlinkkiläDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Markus SormaalaDepartment of Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jari YlinenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Hannu KautiainenResearch Center, Folkhälsan, Helsinki, Finland.
Tero IrmolaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Heidi LehtokangasDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Juho LiukkonenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Konsta PamiloDepartment of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Tero RidanpääDepartment of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Kai SirniöDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Juhana LeppilahtiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Ilkka KivirantaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Juha PalonevaDepartment of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Central Finland Health Care District · FIOulu University Hospital · FITampere University Hospital · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIKuopio University Hospital · FITampere University · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRotator cuff disease (RCD) causes prolonged shoulder pain and disability in adults. RCD is a continuum ranging from tendinopathy to full-thickness tendon tear. Recent studies have shown that subacromial decompression and non-surgical treatments provide equivalent results in RCD without a full-thickness tendon lesion. However, the importance of surgery for full-thickness tendon tears remains unclear.

methodsIn a pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial, 417 patients with subacromial pain underwent 3-month initial rehabilitation and MRI arthrography (MRA) for the diagnosis of RCD. Of these, 190 shoulders remained symptomatic and were randomised to non-surgical or surgical treatments. The primary outcomes were the mean changes in the Visual Analogue Scale for pain and the Constant Murley Score for shoulder function at the 2-year follow-up.

resultsAt the 2-year follow-up, both non-surgical and surgical treatments for RCD reduced pain and improved shoulder function. The scores differed between groups by 4 (95% CI -3 to 10, p=0.25) for pain and 3.4 (95% CI -0.4 to 7.1, p=0.077) for function. Among patients with full-thickness ruptures, the reduction in pain (13, 95% CI 5 to 22, p=0.002) and improvement in function (7.0, 95% CI 1.8 to 12.2, p=0.008) favoured surgery.

conclusionsNon-surgical and surgical treatments for RCD provided equivalent improvements in pain and function. Therefore, we recommend non-surgical treatment as the primary choice for patients with RCD. However, surgery yielded superior improvement in pain and function for full-thickness rotator cuff rupture. Therefore, rotator cuff repair may be suggested after failed non-surgical treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00695981 and NCT00637013.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyRotator CuffAdultFollow-Up StudiesHumansShoulder PainTreatment Outcomeorthopedic procedurespatient reported outcome measuresrehabilitationtendinopathy

Identifiers

PMID33272959
PMCPMC8142425
OpenAlexW3108201120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.