Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33272858›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2021

Health-, medication- and dietary supplement-related behaviors and beliefs relatively unchanged during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.

Michał Seweryn Karbownik, Maria Dobielska, Ewelina Paul, Radosław Przemysław Kowalczyk, Edward Kowalczyk

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michał Seweryn KarbownikDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University of Lodz, 7/9 Zeligowskiego Str, Lodz, 90-752, Poland. Electronic address: michal.karbownik@umed.lodz.pl.
Maria DobielskaStudents' Research Club, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University of Lodz, 7/9 Zeligowskiego Str, Lodz, 90-752, Poland.
Ewelina PaulOSOM STUDIO, 47 Jaracza Str, Lodz, 90-249, Poland.
Radosław Przemysław KowalczykIndependent Scientist, Berlin, Germany.
Edward KowalczykDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University of Lodz, 7/9 Zeligowskiego Str, Lodz, 90-752, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz · PLClimate Analytics · DELodz International Studies Academy · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lockdown imposed to counter the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has evoked an unprecedented phenomenon that could affect health behaviors and beliefs.

objectiveTo examine how medication-, dietary supplement- and health-related behaviors, beliefs and other psychological constructs changed in Polish online health service users during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.

methodsA one-time online survey accessed through a health service website was completed before and during the pandemic lockdown by separate samples of respondents. The survey examined beliefs about medicines and dietary supplements, consumption of dietary supplements, trust and contact with their advertisements, sources of dietary supplement knowledge as well as perceived health, diet, physical activity and smoking, among other things.

resultsThe study included 1560 participants. Most examined outcomes remained unchanged over COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Beliefs that the dietary supplement quality is well controlled became significantly more pronounced during the lockdown (adjusted ratio of estimates 1.16, 95%CI 1.06-1.27, p = 0.001). Fewer people reported having contact with dietary supplement advertisements (adjusted odds ratio 0.59, 95%CI 0.43-0.83, p = 0.002).

conclusionsThe results may help understand some health-related issues associated with COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and may be used to shape aspects of health-related policy.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlDietary SupplementsHumansPolandSARS-CoV-2BehaviorsBeliefsCOVID-19Dietary supplementsMedicinesPandemic lockdown

Identifiers

PMID33272858
PMCPMC7691166
OpenAlexW3110406939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.