Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33272303›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2020

Chiropractic conservatism among chiropractic students in Denmark: prevalence and consequences.

Casper Glissmann Nim, Henrik Hein Lauridsen, Søren O'Neill, Guillaume Goncalves, Rikke K Jensen, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Casper Glissmann NimMedical Research Unit, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, 5500, Middelfart, Denmark. casper.nim@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-5845-2622
Henrik Hein LauridsenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Søren O'NeillMedical Research Unit, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, 5500, Middelfart, Denmark.
Guillaume GoncalvesInstitut Franco Européen de Chiropraxie, 24 Boulevard Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94200, Toulouse, France.
Rikke K JensenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Charlotte Leboeuf-YdeDepartment of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwsparken 19, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe chiropractic profession is split between those practicing evidence-based and those whose practice is honed by vitalism. The latter has been coined 'chiropractic conservatism'. In Denmark, the chiropractic education program is university-based in close collaboration with a medical faculty. We wanted to investigate if such conservative attitudes were present in this environment. Our objectives were to i) determine the level of chiropractic conservatism, ii) investigate if this was linked to academic year of study, iii) determine the level of clinical appropriateness, and iv) to investigate if this was affected by the level of conservatism among students in a chiropractic program, where the students are taught alongside medical students at the University of Southern Denmark (SDU).

methodsA cross-sectional survey of 146 (response-rate 76%) 3rd to 5th year pre-graduate students and 1st year postgraduate clinical interns from the chiropractic degree course at the University of Southern Denmark was conducted during autumn of 2019. The students' levels of conservatism were dichotomized into appropriate/inappropriate, summed up, and used in a linear regression model to determine the association with academic year of study. Thereafter, the conservatism score was categorized into four groups (from low -1- to high -4-). Conservatism groups were cross-tabulated with the ability to answer appropriately on nine cases concerning i) contra-indications, ii) non-indications, and iii) indications for spinal manipulation and analyzed using logistic regression.

resultsGenerally, the Danish chiropractic students had low conservatism scores, decreasing with increasing academic year of study. Seventy percent of the students were placed in the two lowest conservative groups. The level of conservatism (categories 1-3) was moderately (but not statistically significantly) associated with an inability to recognize non-indications to treatment. Three outliers (category 4), however, revealed a highly inappropriate handling of the clinical cases.

conclusionsChiropractic students enrolled at a university-based course closely integrated with a medical teaching environment are not immune to chiropractic conservatism. However, the course appears to attenuate it and limit its effect on clinical decision-making compared to other educational institutions.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceClinical Decision-MakingStudents, Health OccupationsAdultChiropracticCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultChiropractic conservatismChiropractic studentsContra-indicationEducationIndicationNon-indicationSpinal adjustmentsSpinal subluxationSurvey

Identifiers

PMID33272303
PMCPMC7716499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.