Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33272259›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2020

Evaluation of fish skin as a biological dressing for metacarpal wounds in donkeys.

Ahmed Ibrahim, Mahmoud Soliman, Saber Kotb, Magda M Ali

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07142824 (Comparison Between Burn Dressing Using Tilapia-Fish Skin Versus Regular Dressing), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07142824 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between Burn Dressing Using Tilapia-Fish Skin Versus Regular Dressing

TypeinterventionalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsBurnsArmsburn dressing using Tilapia-Fish Skin, burn dressing using regular dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Trends in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Acellular fish skin for wound healing.International wound journal · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Age-Related Properties of Aquaponics-Derived Tilapia Skin (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed IbrahimVeterinary Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt. elgrah38@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9753-5006
Mahmoud SolimanDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt.
Saber KotbDepartment of Animal and Poultry Hygiene, and Environmental Sanitation, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt.
Magda M AliDepartment of Surgery, Anesthesiology, and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt.
Assiut University · EGAssiut University Hospitals · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of biological dressings has recently emerged in the management of burns and wounds. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the Nile tilapia skin as a biological dressing for full-thickness cutaneous metacarpal wounds in donkeys. The study was conducted on nine clinically healthy donkeys (n = 9). Here, fish skin dressings were obtained from fresh Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus and sterilized by immersion in silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) solution for 5 min, with no change in collagen content. Bilateral, circular full-thickness excisional skin wounds (2 cm in diameter) were created on the dorsal aspect of the mid-metacarpals of each donkey. Wounds on the right metacarpals (treated wounds, n = 9) were dressed with sterile fish skins, while wounds on the left metacarpals (control wounds, n = 9) were dressed with sterile non-adherent dressing pads without any topical applications. Wound dressings were changed weekly. Wounds were evaluated microbiologically, grossly, and histologically on days 7, 14, and 21 post-wound inductions.

resultsFish skin-dressed wounds showed a significant (P < 0.0001) reduction in microbial counts (Total viable bacterial count, Staphylococcal count, and Coliform count), a significant (P < 0.0001) decrease in the wound size, and a significant reduction (P < 0.0001) in the epithelial gap compared to the untreated wounds. No frequent dressing changes were needed.

conclusionsFish skin dressing accelerated the wound healing process and efficiently inhibited the local microbial activity and exuberant granulation tissue formation suggesting its reliable and promising application for metacarpal wounds of donkeys.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsBacterial LoadBiological DressingsCichlidsEquidaeFemaleMaleMetal NanoparticlesSilverSkinWounds and InjuriesSilverDonkeysDressingFish skinSilver nanoparticlesTilapiaWounds

Identifiers

PMID33272259
PMCPMC7713020
OpenAlexW3108123326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.