Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33272236›Full record

Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Stretching and relaxing the plantar fascia may change plantar fascia thickness but not pressure pain thresholds: a cross-sectional study of patients with plantar fasciopathy.

Stefanie Ostermann, Jens Lykkegaard Olesen, Sinéad Holden, Henrik Riel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03291665 (Comparing Thickness of the Plantar Fascia in Stretched and Relaxed Positions and the Association With Pressure Pain Threshold in Patients With Plantar Fasciopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03291665 completednot on this map

Comparing Thickness of the Plantar Fascia in Stretched and Relaxed Positions and the Association With Pressure Pain Threshold in Patients With Plantar Fasciopathy

TypeobservationalSponsorAalborg UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled20ConditionsPlantar Fasciopathy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefanie OstermannCenter for General Practice at Aalborg University, Fyrkildevej 7, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Jens Lykkegaard OlesenCenter for General Practice at Aalborg University, Fyrkildevej 7, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Sinéad HoldenCenter for General Practice at Aalborg University, Fyrkildevej 7, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Henrik RielCenter for General Practice at Aalborg University, Fyrkildevej 7, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark. hriel@dcm.aau.dk.
Aalborg University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the established relevance of ultrasonography and assessment of pressure pain thresholds in patients with plantar fasciopathy, patient and probe positioning has been mostly ignored and are not necessarily reported in research. The primary aim of this study was to compare plantar fascia thickness in stretched and relaxed positions in patients with plantar fasciopathy. The secondary aim was to compare plantar heel pressure pain thresholds in these positions.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we measured the plantar fascia thickness with ultrasonography, and localised pressure pain thresholds using pressure algometry of 20 patients with plantar fasciopathy. These were assessed bilaterally, with the plantar fascia in both a stretched and relaxed position. In the stretched position, toes were maximally dorsiflexed, while in the relaxed position participants' feet were hanging freely over the end of the table.

resultsThe plantar fascia of the most symptomatic foot was significantly thicker when stretched compared with the relaxed position (sagittal: mean difference 0.2 mm, 95%CI: 0.1-0.4, P = 0.013; frontal: mean difference - 0.27, 95%CI: - 0.49 to - 0.06, P = 0.014). The plantar fascia was significantly thinner in the frontal plane compared with the sagittal plane in both positions (stretched: mean difference - 0.2 mm, 95%CI: - 0.42 to - 0.03, P = 0.025; relaxed: mean difference - 0.3 mm, 95%CI:-0.49 to - 0.08, P = 0.008). There was no difference between pressure pain thresholds in stretched or relaxed positions in either foot (P > 0.4).

conclusionsThe plantar fascia was significantly thicker in a stretched compared with a relaxed position and in the sagittal compared with the frontal plane, but differences were smaller than the standard deviation. Pressure pain thresholds were not different between the positions. These results highlight the importance of how ultrasonography is performed and reported in research to allow for replication.

trial registrationThe study was pre-registered September 25th, 2017 on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03291665 ).

Indexed as

Fasciitis, PlantarPain ThresholdCross-Sectional StudiesFasciaFootHumansUltrasonographyJoint positioningPlantar fasciopathyPressure pain thresholdUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33272236
PMCPMC7713346
OpenAlexW3107766719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.