Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33272223›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2020

Treatment of established status epilepticus in the elderly - a study protocol for a prospective multicenter double-blind comparative effectiveness trial (ToSEE).

Annekatrin Müller, Anett Schmiedeknecht, Meinhard Mende, Carolin Awissus, Felix Rosenow, Hajo Hamer, Joseph Classen

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Annekatrin MüllerDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. annekatrin.mueller@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8007-6846
Anett SchmiedeknechtClinical Trial Centre Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Meinhard MendeClinical Trial Centre Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Carolin AwissusDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Felix RosenowEpilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhein-Main, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt and LOEWE Center for Personalized Translational Epilepsy Research (CePTER) Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Hajo HamerDepartment of Neurology, Erlangen Epilepsy Center, University of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Joseph ClassenDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DELeipzig University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung No: 01GL1804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatus epilepticus (SE) is a common neurological emergency condition that especially affects the elderly and old population. Older people with SE frequently have non-convulsive SE (NCSE) and are also at special risk of suffering a poor outcome. The application of benzodiazepines fails to control SE in about one third of the cases. For benzodiazepine refractory SE (BRSE) in elderly, there is little evidence that would justify the choice of one of the commonly used antiepileptic drugs. The present study aims to generate evidence for the treatment of BRSE in this age group.

methodsWe will conduct a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparative effectiveness study in more than twenty hospitals in Germany over a four-year period. Four hundred and seventy-seven elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) diagnosed with BRSE will be allocated by 1:1 randomization to receive either levetiracetam or valproate. All types of SE will be considered. For the diagnosis NCSE a verification by EEG is required. Levetiracetam or valproate will be administered in one single infusion. The primary endpoint is the stable cessation of ictal activity 15 min after the start of infusion persisting for the following 45 min of observation. EEG recording is maintained over the whole observation period, clinical examinations are conducted in predefined intervals. In case of treatment success patients and study staff remain blinded until 60 min after the start of the infusion. Adverse events will be recorded until the end of the study. EEG data will be reviewed by two external independent experts. To obtain data about the further treatment of SE, intrahospital complications and the functional outcome in the short term the study participants will be observed until the day of discharge or day 30 whichever is earliest. DISCUSSION: ToSEE is the first study which shall deliver evidence for the SE-therapy in the elderly and old population in a controlled prospective comparator study. By design it also shall collect information about therapy regimes and outcome aspects of this disease.

trial registrationThe trial has been registered at the German Clinical Trials Register on 3 July, 2020 ( DRKS00022308 ,  https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00022308 ).

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsLevetiracetamStatus EpilepticusValproic AcidAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnticonvulsantsLevetiracetamValproic AcidBenzodiazepine refractory status epilepticusElderlyLevetiracetamValproate

Identifiers

PMID33272223
PMCPMC7713039
OpenAlexW3110443578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.