Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33272112›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Dose Prescription Methods in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Small Peripheral Lung Tumors: Approaches Based on the Gross Tumor Volume Are Superior to Prescribing a Dose That Covers 95% of the Planning Target Volume.

Takafumi Komiyama, Masahide Saito, Kengo Kuriyama, Kan Marino, Shinichi Aoki, Ryo Saito, Juria Muramatsu, Yoshiyasu Maehata, Chen Ze, Tomoko Akita and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Harmonization of dose prescription for lung stereotactic radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Takafumi KomiyamaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1123-4585
Masahide SaitoDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8636-4045
Kengo KuriyamaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Kan MarinoDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Shinichi AokiDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Ryo SaitoDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Juria MuramatsuDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Yoshiyasu MaehataDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Chen ZeDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Tomoko AkitaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Takashi YamadaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Naoki SanoDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Kazuya YoshizawaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Ashizawa KazunariDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Suzuki HidekazuDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Koji UedaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Nam VuDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Hiroshi OnishiDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3512-1166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWe aimed to validate the usefulness of prescriptions based on gross tumor volume for stereotactic body radiotherapy for small peripheral lung tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsRadiotherapy treatment planning data of 50 patients with small peripheral lung tumors (adenocarcinoma: 24, squamous cell carcinoma: 10, other: 1, unknown: 15) receiving breath-hold computed tomography-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy at our institution during 2013-2016 were analyzed. For each case, 3 dose prescription methods were applied: one based on 95% (PTVD

resultsUpon switching to GTVD

conclusionSwitching from prescriptions based on 95% of the planning target volume to those based on 98% of the gross tumor volume decreased variations among cases in the overall gross tumor volume dose. Overall, prescriptions based on 98% of the gross tumor volume appear to be more suitable than those based on 95% of the planning target volume in cases of small peripheral lung tumors treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy DosageAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ManagementFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeTumor Burdenneoplasmsnon-small cell lung cancerpulmonary neoplasmsradiation therapytreatment

Identifiers

PMID33272112
PMCPMC7720311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.