Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33271911›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Incidence of Bacteremia Consequent to Different Endoscopic Procedures in Dogs: A Preliminary Study.

Alba Gaspardo, Maria Chiara Sabetti, Renato Giulio Zanoni, Benedetto Morandi, Giorgia Galiazzo, Domenico Mion, Marco Pietra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alba GaspardoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia, BO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7365-3879
Maria Chiara SabettiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia, BO, Italy.
Renato Giulio ZanoniDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia, BO, Italy.
Benedetto MorandiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia, BO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5302-1989
Giorgia GaliazzoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia, BO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-1310
Domenico MionDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia, BO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6879-2751
Marco PietraDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia, BO, Italy.
University of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic procedures are widely used in veterinary medicine, and their role in producing transient bacteremia is debatable. The growing issue of antibiotic resistance requires the correct use of antibiotics, avoiding their administration when not strictly necessary. Studies highlighting post-endoscopy bacteremia in veterinary medicine are extremely rare and often involve very few animals. This study describes the results from 74 owned dogs, brought to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the Department of Veterinary Medical Science of the University of Bologna, for the purpose of undergoing an endoscopic procedure. Two blood samples were taken from each dog, one before and one after the procedure, in order to assess the incidence of bacteremia linked to endoscopic procedures. Eight dogs were tested positive at the second blood culture with an Incidence Risk (IR) of 10.8%. No statistical differences were found by comparing positive and negative blood cultures with respect to sex, age, weight and anesthesia duration. In addition, no difference was found between airway and digestive tract procedures. The present findings showed that the probability of developing bacteremia after an endoscopic procedure was quite low, and additional studies confirming this are certainly recommended as well as the evaluation of categories of patients potentially considered at risk.

Indexed as

bacteremiadogsendoscopyincidence riskrisk ratioveterinary teaching hospital

Identifiers

PMID33271911
PMCPMC7760813
OpenAlexW3109380159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.