Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33271896›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

From Midwife-Dominated to Midwifery-Led Antenatal Care: A Meta-Ethnography.

Bente Dahl, Kristiina Heinonen, Terese Elisabet Bondas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Strengthening Antenatal Care towards a Salutogenic Approach: A Meta-Ethnography.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bente DahlCentre for Women's, Family and Child Health, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Eastern Norway, P.O. Box 235, N-3603 Kongsberg, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7553-8233
Kristiina HeinonenMetropolia University of Applied Sciences, Health Promotion, P.O. Box 4000, FI-00079 Metropolia, Helsinki, Finland.
Terese Elisabet BondasFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, P.O. Box 8600, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1023-6223
Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences · FIUniversity of South-Eastern Norway · NOUniversity of Stavanger · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Provision of antenatal care includes risk identification, prevention and management of pregnancy-related diseases, but also health education, health promotion, support and guidance to smooth the transition to parenthood. To ensure good perinatal health, high-quality, free and easily accessed antenatal care is essential. The aim of this study was to identify, integrate and synthesize knowledge of midwives' experiences of providing antenatal care, attending to clients' individual needs whilst facing multiple challenges. We conducted a meta-ethnography, which is a seven-step grounded, comparative and interpretative methodology for qualitative evidence synthesis. A lines-of-argument synthesis based on two metaphors was developed, based on refutational themes emerging from an analogous translation of findings in the included 14 papers. The model reflects midwives' wished-for transition from a midwife-dominated caring model toward a midwifery-led model of antenatal care. Structural, societal and personal challenges seemingly influenced midwives' provision of antenatal care. However, it emerged that midwives had the willingness to change rigid systems that maintain routine care. The midwifery-led model of care should be firmly based in midwifery science and evidence-based antenatal care that emphasize reflective practices and listening to each woman and her family. The change from traditional models of antenatal care towards increased use of digitalization no longer seems to be a choice, but a necessity given the ongoing 2020 pandemic.

Indexed as

MidwiferyAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPrenatal CareQualitative Researchantenatal caremeta-ethnographymeta-synthesismidwifeprenatal carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID33271896
PMCPMC7730105
OpenAlexW3110255862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.