ArticleBrain sciences2020
Towards Interactive Search: Investigating Visual Search in a Novel Real-World Paradigm.
Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- No stone unturned: Prevalence effects in interactive search are different than those in visual search.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Designing a test battery for real-world visual search.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Easy does it: Selection during interactive search tasks is biased towards objects that can be examined easily.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Picking the right piece: Action intentions shape visual search and action planning in human multi-target-foraging.iScience · 2025Article
- Differential effects of task difficulty on target-type switching in haptic foraging: Evidence for increased switching with extreme task demands.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Real-world visual search goes beyond eye movements: Active searchers select 3D scene viewpoints too.PloS one · 2025Article
- Moving spiders do not boost visual search in spider fear.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Priming effects in inefficient visual search: Real, but transient.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Keeping it real: Looking beyond capacity limits in visual cognition.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An overwhelming majority of studies on visual search and selective attention were conducted using computer screens. There are arguably shortcomings in transferring knowledge from computer-based studies to real-world search behavior as findings are based on viewing static pictures on computer screens. This does not go well with the dynamic and interactive nature of vision in the real world. It is crucial to take visual search research to the real world in order to study everyday visual search processes. The aim of the present study was to develop an interactive search paradigm that can serve as a "bridge" between classical computerized search and everyday interactive search. We based our search paradigm on simple LEGO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.