Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33271867›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

COVID-19 Down Under: Australia's Initial Pandemic Experience.

Matthew James Cook, Gabriela Guizzo Dri, Prishanee Logan, Jia Bin Tan, Antoine Flahault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted clinical care and research in Neuro-Oncology?Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Early Interventions and Impact of COVID-19 in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Coronavirus 2019 Infectious Disease Epidemic: Where We Are, What Can Be Done and Hope For.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2021
    Article
  13. Singapore's Pandemic Preparedness: An Overview of the First Wave of COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew James CookGlobal Studies Institute, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Gabriela Guizzo DriGlobal Studies Institute, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Prishanee LoganGlobal Studies Institute, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9232-1132
Jia Bin TanGlobal Studies Institute, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Antoine FlahaultInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The following case study aims to provide a broad overview of the initial Australian epidemiological situation of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. We provide a case presentation of Australia's current demographic characteristics and an overview of their health care system. The data we present on Australia's COVID-19 situation pertain to the initial wave of the pandemic from January through to 20 April 2020. The results of our study indicate the number of reported COVID-19 cases in Australia reduced, and Australia initially managed to successfully flatten the curve-from an initial doubling time of 3.4 days at the end of March 2020 to a doubling time of 112 days as of 20 April 2020. Using SEIR mathematical modelling, we investigate a scenario assuming infections increase once mitigation measures are lifted. In this case, Australia could experience over 15,000 confirmed cases by the end of April 2020. How Australia's government, health authorities and citizens adjust to preventative measures to reduce the risk of transmission as well as the risk of overburdening Australia's health care system is crucial. Our study presents the initial non-pharmaceutical intervention measures undertaken by the Australian health authorities in efforts to mitigate the rate of infection, and their observed and predicted outcomes. Finally, we conclude our study by presenting the observed and expected economic, social, and political disruptions Australians may endure as a result of the initial phase of the pandemic.

Indexed as

PandemicsAustraliaCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2acute respiratory diseaseAustraliacase studycountry economyCOVID-19epidemiologyexit strategiesmathematical modellingmedia coveragenon pharmaceutical interventionnovel coronavirussocial political disruption

Identifiers

PMID33271867
PMCPMC7730791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.