Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33271811›Full record

ArticleClocks & sleep2020

Loss of Circadian Timing Disrupts Theta Episodes during Object Exploration.

Adrienne C Loewke, Alex Garrett, Athreya Steiger, Nathan Fisher, H Craig Heller, Damien Colas, Norman F Ruby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clocks & sleep, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adrienne C LoewkeBiology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Alex GarrettBiology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Athreya SteigerBiology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Nathan FisherBiology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
H Craig HellerBiology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4479-5880
Damien ColasBiology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Norman F RubyBiology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0447-951X

Funding

Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Output Pathway for Learning and MemoryR01MH095837 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HELLER, H CRAIG · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS MH095837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined whether theta oscillations were compromised by the type of circadian disruption that impairs hippocampal-dependent memory processes. In prior studies on Siberian hamsters, we developed a one-time light treatment that eliminated circadian timing in the central pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). These arrhythmic animals had impaired hippocampal-dependent memory whereas animals made arrhythmic with SCN lesions did not. The current study examined whether theta oscillations are compromised by the same light treatment that produced memory impairments in these animals. We found that both methods of inducing circadian-arrhythmia shortened theta episodes in the EEG by nearly 50%. SCN-lesioned animals, however, exhibited a 3-fold increase in the number of theta episodes and more than doubled the total time that theta dominated the EEG compared to SCN-intact circadian-arrhythmic animals. Video tracking showed that changes in theta were paralleled by similar changes in exploration behavior. These results suggest that the circadian-arrhythmic SCN interferes with hippocampal memory encoding by fragmenting theta oscillations. SCN-lesioned animals can, however, compensate for the shortened theta episodes by increasing their frequency. Implications for rhythm coherence and theta sequence models of memory formation are discussed.

Indexed as

circadianEEGhippocampusmemorysuprachiasmatictheta oscillation

Identifiers

PMID33271811
PMCPMC7711584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.