Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33271596›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2021

Perspective: Measuring Sweetness in Foods, Beverages, and Diets: Toward Understanding the Role of Sweetness in Health.

Paula R Trumbo, Katherine M Appleton, Kees de Graaf, John E Hayes, David J Baer, Gary K Beauchamp, Johanna T Dwyer, John D Fernstrom, David M Klurfeld, Richard D Mattes and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paula R TrumboDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Katherine M AppletonDepartment of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Dorset, United Kingdom.
Kees de GraafDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
John E HayesDepartment of Food Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
David J BaerUS Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Gary K BeauchampMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Johanna T DwyerSchool of Medicine and Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
John D FernstromSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David M KlurfeldUS Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Richard D MattesPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Paul M WiseMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various global public health agencies recommend minimizing exposure to sweet-tasting foods or beverages. The underlying rationale is that reducing exposure to the perception of sweet tastes, without regard to the source of sweetness, may reduce preferences for sweetness, added sugar intake, caloric intake, and body weight. However, the veracity of this sequence of outcomes has yet to be documented, as revealed by findings from recent systematic reviews on the topic. Efforts to examine and document the effects of sweetness exposure are needed to support evidence-based recommendations. They require a generally agreed-upon methodology for measuring sweetness in foods, beverages, and the overall diet. Although well-established sensory evaluation techniques exist for individual foods in laboratory settings, they are expensive and time-consuming, and agreement on the optimal approach for measuring the sweetness of the total diet is lacking. If such a measure could be developed, it would permit researchers to combine data from different studies and populations and facilitate the design and conduct of new studies to address unresolved research questions about dietary sweetness. This narrative review includes an overview of available sensory techniques, their strengths and limitations, recent efforts to measure the sweetness of foods and diets across countries and cultures, and a proposed future direction for improving methods for measuring sweetness toward developing the data required to support evidence-based recommendations around dietary sweetness.

Indexed as

Food PreferencesSweetening AgentsBeveragesDietHumansTasteSweetening Agentsdietnutritionsensory measuresweetnesssweetness exposuretaste

Identifiers

PMID33271596
PMCPMC8009737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.