Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33271446›Full record

ArticleResearch in developmental disabilities2021

Distance support and online intervention to blind and visually impaired children during the pandemic COVID-19.

Tiziana Battistin, Elena Mercuriali, Vincenzo Zanardo, Dario Gregori, Giulia Lorenzoni, Laura Nasato, Maria Eleonora Reffo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in developmental disabilities, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Telerehabilitation for people with low vision.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Inclusive Crisis Communication in a Pandemic Context: A Rapid Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tiziana BattistinRobert Hollman Foundation "Consultation and Support for the Development of Visually Impaired Children", Via Siena 1, Padova, Italy. Electronic address: t.battistin@fondazioneroberthollman.it.
Elena MercurialiRobert Hollman Foundation "Consultation and Support for the Development of Visually Impaired Children", Via Siena 1, Padova, Italy.
Vincenzo ZanardoRobert Hollman Foundation "Consultation and Support for the Development of Visually Impaired Children", Via Siena 1, Padova, Italy.
Dario GregoriUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Italy.
Giulia LorenzoniUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Italy.
Laura NasatoUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Italy.
Maria Eleonora ReffoRobert Hollman Foundation "Consultation and Support for the Development of Visually Impaired Children", Via Siena 1, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic imposed dramatic changes to everyone's daily routines, but especially to children with developmental disabilities. The Robert Hollman Foundation decided not to interrupt its service to all the visually impaired children and initiated a Distance Support Project. It was an online process covering all aspects of support for the children and involving audio-video calls, videos and tailored-made multisensory material created specifically for each child. A questionnaire, carried out after the 5-month project duration, was created to collect feedback from parents and professionals to understand the impact this project had on everyone involved. Overall both parents and professionals indicated high levels of satisfaction, but in a significant number of questions parents reported consistently higher levels of satisfaction (p-value <0.001). It was shown that parents felt reassured at this otherwise very difficult time because their children were able to continue their treatment, even if in a very different way. This fact encourages us to consider enriching our existing programmes of support and care, integrating this online approach when necessary. At the same time, it seems clear that the responses of the professionals indicate their belief that the benefits of the traditional ways of working remain of unquestionable importance for children with sight deprivation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Internet-Based InterventionPersons with Visual DisabilitiesPsychosocial Support SystemsAudiovisual AidsChildFamily HealthFemaleHumansMaleOrganizational InnovationParentsPatient Care ManagementSARS-CoV-2TelemedicineCOVID-19 pandemicDevelopmental disabilitiesDistance supportOnline interventionVisually impaired children

Identifiers

PMID33271446
PMCPMC7682482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.