Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33271193›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2021

Considerations to Support Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Measures in Ambulatory Clinics.

Elizabeth D Cox, Sarah K Dobrozsi, Christopher B Forrest, Wendy E Gerhardt, Harald Kliems, Bryce B Reeve, Nan E Rothrock, Jin-Shei Lai, Jacob M Svenson, Lindsay A Thompson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elizabeth D CoxDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Sarah K DobrozsiDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Christopher B ForrestDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Wendy E GerhardtJames M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Harald KliemsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Bryce B ReeveDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Nan E RothrockDepartments of Medical Social Sciences, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, and Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Jin-Shei LaiMedical Social Sciences and Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Jacob M SvensonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Lindsay A ThompsonDepartments of Pediatrics and Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Thuy Dan N TranDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Carole A TuckerDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
The Midwest Child Patient Reported Outcomes (M-cPROs) ConsortiumU19AR069519 · NIAMS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI PANEPINTO, JULIE A · 2015 to 2017
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NIAMS NIH HHS U19 AR069519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify challenges to the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric measures in the ambulatory pediatric setting and possible solutions to these challenges. STUDY

designEighteen semistructured telephone interviews of health system leaders, measurement implementers, and ambulatory pediatric clinicians were conducted. Five coders used applied thematic analysis to iteratively identify and refine themes in interview data.

resultsMost interviewees had roles in leadership or the implementation of patient-centered outcomes; 39% were clinicians. Some had experience using PROMIS clinically (44%) and 6% were considering this use. Analyses yielded 6 themes: (1) selection of PROMIS measures, (2) method of administration, (3) use of PROMIS Parent Proxy measures, (4) privacy and confidentiality of PROMIS responses, (5) interpretation of PROMIS scores, and (6) using PROMIS scores clinically. Within the themes, interviewees illuminated specific unique considerations for using PROMIS with children, including care transitions and privacy.

conclusionsReal-world challenges continue to hamper PROMIS use. Ongoing efforts to disseminate information about the integration of PROMIS measures in clinical care is critical to impacting the health of children.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesInformation SystemsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresChildHumansPediatricsadministrationclinical useconfidentialityfamily-centered careimplementationoutpatientpatient-centered carepatient-reported outcomesscoring

Identifiers

PMID33271193
PMCPMC7914197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.