Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33271162›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2021

Neural and phenotypic representation under the free-energy principle.

Maxwell J D Ramstead, Casper Hesp, Alexander Tschantz, Ryan Smith, Axel Constant, Karl Friston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Shared Protentions in Multi-Agent Active Inference.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Psychophysical identity and free energy.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maxwell J D RamsteadDivision of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Culture, Mind, and Brain Program, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, WC1N3BG, UK. Electronic address: maxwell.ramstead@mail.mcgill.ca.
Casper HespWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, WC1N3BG, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Centre, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Institute for Advanced Study, University of Amsterdam, Oude Turfmarkt 147, 1012 GC Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: c.hesp@uva.nl.
Alexander TschantzSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK; Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. Electronic address: tschantz.alec@gmail.com.
Ryan SmithLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA. Electronic address: rsmith@laureateinstitute.org.
Axel ConstantCulture, Mind, and Brain Program, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, WC1N3BG, UK; Theory and Method in Biosciences, Level 6, Charles Perkins Centre D17, Johns Hopkins Drive, University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. Electronic address: axel.constant.pruvost@gmail.com.
Karl FristonWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, WC1N3BG, UK. Electronic address: k.friston@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 088130/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to leverage the free-energy principle and its corollary process theory, active inference, to develop a generic, generalizable model of the representational capacities of living creatures; that is, a theory of phenotypic representation. Given their ubiquity, we are concerned with distributed forms of representation (e.g., population codes), whereby patterns of ensemble activity in living tissue come to represent the causes of sensory input or data. The active inference framework rests on the Markov blanket formalism, which allows us to partition systems of interest, such as biological systems, into internal states, external states, and the blanket (active and sensory) states that render internal and external states conditionally independent of each other. In this framework, the representational capacity of living creatures emerges as a consequence of their Markovian structure and nonequilibrium dynamics, which together entail a dual-aspect information geometry. This entails a modest representational capacity: internal states have an intrinsic information geometry that describes their trajectory over time in state space, as well as an extrinsic information geometry that allows internal states to encode (the parameters of) probabilistic beliefs about (fictive) external states. Building on this, we describe here how, in an automatic and emergent manner, information about stimuli can come to be encoded by groups of neurons bound by a Markov blanket; what is known as the neuronal packet hypothesis. As a concrete demonstration of this type of emergent representation, we present numerical simulations showing that self-organizing ensembles of active inference agents sharing the right kind of probabilistic generative model are able to encode recoverable information about a stimulus array.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeuronsEntropyHumansActive inferenceFree-energy principleMarkov blanketsNeural representationNeuronal packet hypothesisPhenotypic representation

Identifiers

PMID33271162
PMCPMC7955287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.