Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33271114›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Oncology2020

Improving oncology biosimilar launches in the EU, the USA, and Japan: an updated Policy Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions.

Charles L Bennett, Martin W Schoen, Shamia Hoque, Bartlett J Witherspoon, David M Aboulafia, Catherine S Hwang, Paul Ray, Paul R Yarnold, Brian K Chen, Benjamin Schooley and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Switching from One Biosimilar to Another Biosimilar of the Same Reference Biologic: A Systematic Review of Studies.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Current status and trends of anti-tumor biosimilars in China from 2019 to 2023: A cross-sectional analysis.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Charles L BennettCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA; WJB Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, SC, USA; Department of Comparative Medicine and Evidence Based Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA. Electronic address: bennettc@cop.sc.edu.
Martin W SchoenSaint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA; John Cochran VA Medical Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Shamia HoqueCollege of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA; WJB Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, SC, USA.
Bartlett J WitherspoonCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
David M AboulafiaVirginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Catherine S HwangVirginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Paul RayCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Paul R YarnoldCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Brian K ChenThe Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA; WJB Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, SC, USA.
Benjamin SchooleyCollege of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Matthew A TaylorSchool of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Michael D WyattCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
William J HrusheskyCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Y Tony YangSchool of Nursing and Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
University of South Carolina · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · USCity of Hope · USGeorge Washington University · USJohn Cochran VA Medical Center · USWm. Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Southern Oncology Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) - Focus on Tyrosine KinaseR01CA165609 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BENNETT, CHARLES L. · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The EU, the USA, and Japan account for the majority of biological pharmacotherapy use worldwide. Biosimilar regulatory approval pathways were authorised in the EU (2006), in Japan (2009), and in the USA (2015), to facilitate approval of biological drugs that are highly similar to reference products and to encourage market competition. Between 2007 and 2020, 33 biosimilars for oncology were approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), 16 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and ten by the Japan Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Some of these approved applications were initially rejected because of manufacturing concerns (four of 36 [11%] with the EMA, seven of 16 [44%] with the FDA, none of ten for the PMDA). Median times from initial regulatory submission before approval of oncology biosimilars were 1·5 years (EMA), 1·3 years (FDA), and 0·9 years (PMDA). Pharmacists can substitute biosimilars for reference biologics in some EU countries, but not in the USA or Japan. US regulation prohibits substitution, unless the biosimilar has been approved as interchangeable, a designation not yet achieved for any biosimilar in the USA. Japan does not permit biosimilar substitution, as prescribers must include the product name on each prescription and that specific product must be given to the patient. Policy Reviews published in 2014 and 2016 in The Lancet Oncology focused on premarket and postmarket policies for oncology biosimilars before most of these drugs received regulatory approval. In this Policy Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions, we identify factors preventing the effective launch of oncology biosimilars. Introduction to the market has been more challenging with therapeutic than for supportive care oncology biosimilars. Addressing region-specific competition barriers and educational needs would improve the regulatory approval process and market launches for these biologics, therefore expanding patient access to these products in the EU, the USA, and Japan.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDrug SubstitutionErythropoietinEuropeFilgrastimHematinicsHumansJapanNeoplasmsPatient SafetyPolicy MakingPolyethylene GlycolsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsErythropoietinFilgrastimHematinicspegfilgrastimPolyethylene GlycolsRituximabTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID33271114
PMCPMC12491062
OpenAlexW3106651340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.