Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33271093›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2020

Efficacy of the bivalent HPV vaccine against HPV 16/18-associated precancer: long-term follow-up results from the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial.

Carolina Porras, Sabrina H Tsang, Rolando Herrero, Diego Guillén, Teresa M Darragh, Mark H Stoler, Allan Hildesheim, Sarah Wagner, Joseph Boland, Douglas R Lowy and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00867464 (Extended Follow-Up of Young Women in Costa Rica Who Received Vaccination Against Human Papillomavirus Types 16 and 18 and Unvaccinated Controls), which is not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00867464 active not recruitingnot on this map

Extended Follow-Up of Young Women in Costa Rica Who Received Vaccination Against Human Papillomavirus Types 16 and 18 and Unvaccinated Controls

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2009 to 2026Enrolled8,670ConditionsAnal Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma, Human Papillomavirus Infection, Human Papillomavirus-Related Cervical CarcinomaArmsCytology Specimen Collection Procedure, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Long-term Follow-up, Questionnaire Administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Developing Antiviral Vaccines Based on AttenuatedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Factors Associated with HPV Vaccination Among Japanese Women: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the 7 C Vaccination Readiness Model.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Signaling pathways and targeted interventions for precancers.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Carolina PorrasAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica. Electronic address: cporras@acibcr.com.
Sabrina H TsangDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Rolando HerreroAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica; Early Detection and Prevention Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France.
Diego GuillénAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica.
Teresa M DarraghUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mark H StolerDepartment of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Allan HildesheimDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Sarah WagnerCancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Joseph BolandCancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Douglas R LowyDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
John T SchillerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Mark SchiffmanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
John SchusslerInformation Management Services, Calverton, MD, USA.
Mitchell H GailDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Wim QuintDDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, Netherlands.
Rebeca OcampoAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica.
Jorge MoralesAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica.
Ana C RodríguezSan José, Costa Rica.
Shangying HuDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Joshua N SampsonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Aimée R KreimerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Costa Rica Vaccine Trial Group
National Institutes of Health · USInstituto Costarricense de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud · CRNational Cancer Institute · USDDL Diagnostic Laboratory · NLUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Virginia · USCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRInformation Management Services · USLeidos Biomedical Research Inc. (United States)Leidos (United States) · US

Funding

HPV Vaccine TrialZIACP010217 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI KREIMER, AIMEE · 2011 to 2025
$42.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP010217NCI NIH HHS N01 CP011005World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infections cause most cases of cervical cancer. Here, we report long-term follow-up results for the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (publicly funded and initiated before licensure of the HPV vaccines), with the aim of assessing the efficacy of the bivalent HPV vaccine for preventing HPV 16/18-associated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+).

methodsWomen aged 18-25 years were enrolled in a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial in Costa Rica, between June 28, 2004, and Dec 21, 2005, designed to assess the efficacy of a bivalent vaccine for the prevention of infection with HPV 16/18 and associated precancerous lesions at the cervix. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive an HPV 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine or control hepatitis A vaccine. Vaccines were administered intramuscularly in three 0·5 mL doses at 0, 1, and 6 months and participants were followed up annually for 4 years. After the blinded phase, women in the HPV vaccine group were invited to enrol in the long-term follow-up study, which extended follow-up for 7 additional years. The control group received HPV vaccine and was replaced with a new unvaccinated control group. Women were followed up every 2 years until year 11. Investigators and patients were aware of treatment allocation for the follow-up phase. At each visit, clinicians collected cervical cells from sexually active women for cytology and HPV testing. Women with abnormal cytology were referred to colposcopy, biopsy, and treatment as needed. Women with negative results at the last screening visit (year 11) exited the long-term follow-up study. The analytical cohort for vaccine efficacy included women who were HPV 16/18 DNA-negative at vaccination. The primary outcome of this analysis was defined as histopathologically confirmed CIN2+ or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse associated with HPV 16/18 cervical infection detected at colposcopy referral. We calculated vaccine efficacy by year and cumulatively. This long-term follow-up study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00867464.

findings7466 women were enrolled in the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial; 3727 received the HPV vaccine and 3739 received the control vaccine. Between March 30, 2009, and July 5, 2012, 2635 women in the HPV vaccine group and 2836 women in the new unvaccinated control group were enrolled in the long-term follow-up study. 2635 women in the HPV vaccine group and 2677 women in the control group were included in the analysis cohort for years 0-4, and 2073 women from the HPV vaccine group and 2530 women from the new unvaccinated control group were included in the analysis cohort for years 7-11. Median follow-up time for the HPV group was 11·1 years (IQR 9·1-11·7), 4·6 years (4·3-5·3) for the original control group, and 6·2 years (5·5-6·9) for the new unvaccinated control group. At year 11, vaccine efficacy against incident HPV 16/18-associated CIN2+ was 100% (95% CI 89·2-100·0); 34 (1·5%) of 2233 unvaccinated women had a CIN2+ outcome compared with none of 1913 women in the HPV group. Cumulative vaccine efficacy against HPV 16/18-associated CIN2+ over the 11-year period was 97·4% (95% CI 88·0-99·6). Similar protection was observed against HPV 16/18-associated CIN3-specifically at year 11, vaccine efficacy was 100% (95% CI 78·8-100·0) and cumulative vaccine efficacy was 94·9% (73·7-99·4). During the long-term follow-up, no serious adverse events occurred that were deemed related to the HPV vaccine. The most common grade 3 or worse serious adverse events were pregnancy, puerperium, and perinatal conditions (in 255 [10%] of 2530 women in the unvaccinated control group and 201 [10%] of 2073 women in the HPV vaccine group). Four women in the unvaccinated control group and three in the HPV vaccine group died; no deaths were deemed to be related to the HPV vaccine.

interpretationThe bivalent HPV vaccine has high efficacy against HPV 16/18-associated precancer for more than a decade after initial vaccination, supporting the notion that invasive cervical cancer is preventable.

fundingUS National Cancer Institute.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCosta RicaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansImmunizationNeoplasm GradingPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical Neoplasmshuman papillomavirus vaccine, L1 type 16, 18Papillomavirus VaccinesVaccines, Combined

Identifiers

PMID33271093
PMCPMC8724969
OpenAlexW3108183907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.