ArticleDevelopmental psychology2021
Developmental change in the nature of attention allocation in a dual task.
Article in Developmental psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- People are sensitive to environmental predictability when engaging cognitive control.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- No evidence for cross-paradigm transfer of abstract task knowledge in adults and school-aged children.Memory & cognition · 2025Article
- The Relation Between Attention and Memory.Annual review of psychology · 2024Review
- Disentangling Processing and Storage Accounts of Working Memory Development in Childhood.Developmental review : DR · 2023Article
- Working Memory Constrains Long-Term Memory in Children and Adults: Memory of Objects and Bindings.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
- Working memory development: A 50-year assessment of research and underlying theories.Cognition · 2022Article
- The role of domain-general attention and domain-specific processing in working memory in algebraic performance: An experimental approach.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2022Article
- Differentiation of Two Working Memory Tasks Normed on a Large U.S. Sample of Children 2-7 Years Old.Child development · 2021Article
- Developmental change in the nature of attention allocation in a dual task.Developmental psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Younger children have more difficulty in sharing attention between two concurrent tasks than do older participants, but in addition to this developmental change, we documented changes in the nature of attention sharing. We studied children 6-8 and 10-14 years old and college students (in all, 104 women and 76 men; 3% Hispanic, 3% Black or African American, 3% Asian, 7% multiracial, and 84% White). On each dual-task trial, the participant received an array of colored squares to be retained for a subsequent probe recognition test and then an easy or more difficult signal requiring a quick response (a speeded task, clicking a key on the same side of the screen as the signal or the opposite side). Finally, each trial ended with the presentation of the array item recognition probe and the participant's response to it. In our youngest age group (6-8 years), array memory was often displaced by the speeded task performed under load, especially when it was the opposite-side task, but speeded-task accuracies were unaffected by the presence of an array memory load. In contrast, in older participants (10-14 years and college students), the memory load was maintained better, with some cost to the speeded task. With maturity, participants were better able to adopt a proactive stance in which not only present processing demands but also upcoming demands were taken into account, allowing them to balance the demands of the two tasks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.