Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33270888›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

A fast and robust iterative genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors strategy.

Jichao Wang, Xinyue Sui, Yamei Ding, Yingxin Fu, Xinjun Feng, Min Liu, Youming Zhang, Mo Xian, Guang Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CRISPR-Cas9-assisted genome editing inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Synthetic biology tools for engineeringComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jichao WangCAS Key Lab of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101 Qingdao, China.
Xinyue SuiCAS Key Lab of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101 Qingdao, China.
Yamei DingInstitute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266071 Qingdao, China.
Yingxin FuCAS Key Lab of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101 Qingdao, China.
Xinjun FengCAS Key Lab of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101 Qingdao, China.
Min LiuCAS Key Lab of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101 Qingdao, China.
Youming ZhangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, 266237 Qingdao, China.
Mo XianCAS Key Lab of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101 Qingdao, China.
Guang ZhaoCAS Key Lab of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266101 Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of optimized strains of a specific phenotype requires the construction and testing of a large number of genome modifications and combinations thereof. Most bacterial iterative genome-editing methods include essential steps to eliminate selection markers, or to cure plasmids. Additionally, the presence of escapers leads to time-consuming separate single clone picking and subsequent cultivation steps. Herein, we report a genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors (RPS) strategy. Each of three constructed sgRNA plasmids can cure, or be cured by, the other two plasmids in the system; plasmids from a previous round of editing can be cured while the current round of editing takes place. Due to the enhanced curing efficiency and embedded double check mechanism, separate steps for plasmid curing or confirmation are not necessary, and only two times of cultivation are needed per genome-editing round. This method was successfully demonstrated in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae with both gene deletions and replacements. To the best of our knowledge, this is the fastest and most robust iterative genome-editing method, with the least times of cultivation decreasing the possibilities of spontaneous genome mutations.

Indexed as

ChloramphenicolClone CellsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDrug Resistance, MicrobialEscherichia coliGene EditingGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene Knockout TechniquesGenes, BacterialKanamycinKanamycin ResistanceKlebsiella pneumoniaeLactatesMutationNucleotide MotifsPlasmidsChloramphenicolKanamycinLactatesPyruvic AcidRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTetracycline

Identifiers

PMID33270888
PMCPMC7826264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.