Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33270735›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Perceptual learning of pitch provided by cochlear implant stimulation rate.

Susan R S Bissmeyer, Shaikat Hossain, Raymond L Goldsworthy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rate Discrimination Training May Partially Restore Temporal Processing Abilities from Age-Related Deficits.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan R S BissmeyerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6169-4323
Shaikat HossainAuditory Research Center, Caruso Department of Otolaryngology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Raymond L GoldsworthyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Training in Hearing & Communication NeuroscienceT32DC009975 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christopher A Shera · 2009 to 2026
$5.0M
Encoding Temporal Fine Structure for Cochlear ImplantsR01DC018044 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI RAYMOND L GOLDSWORTHY · 2020 to 2026
$3.7M
Music Appreciation after Cochlear ImplantationR01DC018701 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOLDSWORTHY, RAYMOND L · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018044NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018701NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC009975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implant users hear pitch evoked by stimulation rate, but discrimination diminishes for rates above 300 Hz. This upper limit on rate pitch is surprising given the remarkable and specialized ability of the auditory nerve to respond synchronously to stimulation rates at least as high as 3 kHz and arguably as high as 10 kHz. Sensitivity to stimulation rate as a pitch cue varies widely across cochlear implant users and can be improved with training. The present study examines individual differences and perceptual learning of stimulation rate as a cue for pitch ranking. Adult cochlear implant users participated in electrode psychophysics that involved testing once per week for three weeks. Stimulation pulse rate discrimination was measured in bipolar and monopolar configurations for apical and basal electrodes. Base stimulation rates between 100 and 800 Hz were examined. Individual differences were quantified using psychophysically derived metrics of spatial tuning and temporal integration. This study examined distribution of measures across subjects, predictive power of psychophysically derived metrics of spatial tuning and temporal integration, and the effect of training on rate discrimination thresholds. Psychophysical metrics of spatial tuning and temporal integration were not predictive of stimulation rate discrimination, but discrimination thresholds improved at lower frequencies with training. Since most clinical devices do not use variable stimulation rates, it is unknown to what extent recipients may learn to use stimulation rate cues if provided in a clear and consistent manner.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsLearningAdolescentAdultFemaleHearing LossHumansMaleMiddle AgedPitch Perception

Identifiers

PMID33270735
PMCPMC7714175
OpenAlexW3106647886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.