ArticlePloS one2020
Identification of superior parental lines for biparental crossing via genomic prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on genomic selection breeding technology for crops.Protoplasma · 2026Review
- Optimizing training sets for genomic selection to identify superior genotypes across multiple environments.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Predictive breeding and marker-assisted selection for grain quality and freezing tolerance in durum wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Accelerated breeding modernization: a global blueprint for driving genetic gains, climate resilience, and food security in rice.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Sweet pepper yield modeling via deep learning and selection of superior genotypes using GBLUP and MGIDI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genomic estimated selection criteria and parental contributions in parent selection increase genetic gain of maternal haploid inducers in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Genetic gains in IRRI's rice salinity breeding and elite panel development as a future breeding resource.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Sample size determination for training set optimization in genomic prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023Article
- Identification of Disease Resistance Parents and Genome-Wide Association Mapping of Resistance in Spring Wheat.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Selection of parental lines for plant breedingFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A parental selection approach based on genomic prediction has been developed to help plant breeders identify a set of superior parental lines from a candidate population before conducting field trials. A classical parental selection approach based on genomic prediction usually involves truncation selection, i.e., selecting the top fraction of accessions on the basis of their genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs). However, truncation selection inevitably results in the loss of genomic diversity during the breeding process. To preserve genomic diversity, the selection of closely related accessions should be avoided during parental selection. We thus propose a new index to quantify the genomic diversity for a set of candidate accessions, and analyze two real rice (Oryza sativa L.) genome datasets to compare several selection strategies. Our results showed that the pure truncation selection strategy produced the best starting breeding value but the least genomic diversity in the base population, leading to less genetic gain. On the other hand, strategies that considered only genomic diversity resulted in greater genomic diversity but less favorable starting breeding values, leading to more genetic gain but unsatisfactorily performing recombination inbred lines (RILs) in progeny populations. Among all strategies investigated in this study, compromised strategies, which considered both GEBVs and genomic diversity, produced the best or second-best performing RILs mainly because these strategies balance the starting breeding value with the maintenance of genomic diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.