Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33270704›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

How massed practice improves visual expertise in reading panoramic radiographs in dental students: An eye tracking study.

Juliane Richter, Katharina Scheiter, Thérése Felicitas Eder, Fabian Huettig, Constanze Keutel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juliane RichterLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8418-0931
Katharina ScheiterLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.
Thérése Felicitas EderLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.
Fabian HuettigDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Hospital for Dentistry, Oral Medicine, and Maxillofacial Surgery at the University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Constanze KeutelRadiology Department of the University Hospital for Dentistry, Oral Medicine, and Maxillofacial Surgery at the University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interpretation of medical images is an error-prone process that may yield severe consequences for patients. In dental medicine panoramic radiography (OPT) is a frequently used diagnostic procedure. OPTs typically contain multiple, diverse anomalies within one image making the diagnostic process very demanding, rendering students' development of visual expertise a complex task. Radiograph interpretation is typically taught through massed practice; however, it is not known how effective this approach is nor how it changes students' visual inspection of radiographs. Therefore, this study investigated how massed practice-an instructional method that entails massed learning of one type of material-affects processing of OPTs and the development of diagnostic performance. From 2017 to 2018, 47 dental students in their first clinical semester diagnosed 10 OPTs before and after their regular massed practice training, which is embedded in their curriculum. The OPTs contained between 3 to 26 to-be-identified anomalies. During massed practice they diagnosed 100 dental radiographs without receiving corrective feedback. The authors recorded students' eye movements and assessed the number of correctly identified and falsely marked low- and high prevalence anomalies before and after massed practice. Massed practice had a positive effect on detecting anomalies especially with low prevalence (p < .001). After massed practice students covered a larger proportion of the OPTs (p < .001), which was positively related to the detection of low-prevalence anomalies (p = .04). Students also focused longer, more frequently, and earlier on low-prevalence anomalies after massed practice (ps < .001). While massed practice improved visual expertise in dental students with limited prior knowledge, there is still substantial room for improvement. The results suggest integrating massed practice with more deliberate practice, where, for example, corrective feedback is provided, and support is adapted to students' needs.

Indexed as

Eye-Tracking TechnologyRadiography, PanoramicStudents, DentalAdultEducation, DentalFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID33270704
PMCPMC7714201
OpenAlexW3106822148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.