Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33270638›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2020

Primate phylogenomics uncovers multiple rapid radiations and ancient interspecific introgression.

Dan Vanderpool, Bui Quang Minh, Robert Lanfear, Daniel Hughes, Shwetha Murali, R Alan Harris, Muthuswamy Raveendran, Donna M Muzny, Mark S Hibbins, Robert J Williamson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phylogenetic networks empower biodiversity research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Orphan genes are not a distinct biological entity.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dan VanderpoolDepartment of Biology and Department of Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6856-5636
Bui Quang MinhResearch School of Computer Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Robert LanfearResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-2596
Daniel HughesHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Shwetha MuraliHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
R Alan HarrisHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7333-4752
Muthuswamy RaveendranHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6185-4059
Donna M MuznyHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Mark S HibbinsDepartment of Biology and Department of Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4651-3704
Robert J WilliamsonDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering and Department of Biology and Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9732-0964
Richard A GibbsHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Kim C WorleyHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0282-1000
Jeffrey RogersHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7374-6490
Matthew W HahnDepartment of Biology and Department of Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5731-8808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the evolutionary history of primates is undergoing continual revision due to ongoing genome sequencing efforts. Bolstered by growing fossil evidence, these data have led to increased acceptance of once controversial hypotheses regarding phylogenetic relationships, hybridization and introgression, and the biogeographical history of primate groups. Among these findings is a pattern of recent introgression between species within all major primate groups examined to date, though little is known about introgression deeper in time. To address this and other phylogenetic questions, here, we present new reference genome assemblies for 3 Old World monkey (OWM) species: Colobus angolensis ssp. palliatus (the black and white colobus), Macaca nemestrina (southern pig-tailed macaque), and Mandrillus leucophaeus (the drill). We combine these data with 23 additional primate genomes to estimate both the species tree and individual gene trees using thousands of loci. While our species tree is largely consistent with previous phylogenetic hypotheses, the gene trees reveal high levels of genealogical discordance associated with multiple primate radiations. We use strongly asymmetric patterns of gene tree discordance around specific branches to identify multiple instances of introgression between ancestral primate lineages. In addition, we exploit recent fossil evidence to perform fossil-calibrated molecular dating analyses across the tree. Taken together, our genome-wide data help to resolve multiple contentious sets of relationships among primates, while also providing insight into the biological processes and technical artifacts that led to the disagreements in the first place.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionCercopithecidaeComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticFossilsGene FlowGenetic IntrogressionGenomeModels, GeneticPhylogenyPrimatesSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID33270638
PMCPMC7738166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.