Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33270631›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2020

Subpopulations of sensorless bacteria drive fitness in fluctuating environments.

Thomas Julou, Ludovit Zweifel, Diana Blank, Athos Fiori, Erik van Nimwegen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microbial life in slow and stopped lanes.Trends in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Minorities drive growth resumption in cross-feeding microbial communities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Effective bet-hedging through growth rate dependent stability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas JulouBiozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7123-198X
Ludovit ZweifelBiozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Diana BlankBiozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Athos FioriBiozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2258-5620
Erik van NimwegenBiozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6338-1312
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Populations of bacteria often undergo a lag in growth when switching conditions. Because growth lags can be large compared to typical doubling times, variations in growth lag are an important but often overlooked component of bacterial fitness in fluctuating environments. We here explore how growth lag variation is determined for the archetypical switch from glucose to lactose as a carbon source in Escherichia coli. First, we show that single-cell lags are bimodally distributed and controlled by a single-molecule trigger. That is, gene expression noise causes the population before the switch to divide into subpopulations with zero and nonzero lac operon expression. While "sensorless" cells with zero preexisting lac expression at the switch have long lags because they are unable to sense the lactose signal, any nonzero lac operon expression suffices to ensure a short lag. Second, we show that the growth lag at the population level depends crucially on the fraction of sensorless cells and that this fraction in turn depends sensitively on the growth condition before the switch. Consequently, even small changes in basal expression can significantly affect the fraction of sensorless cells, thereby population lags and fitness under switching conditions, and may thus be subject to significant natural selection. Indeed, we show that condition-dependent population lags vary across wild E. coli isolates. Since many sensory genes are naturally low expressed in conditions where their inducer is not present, bimodal responses due to subpopulations of sensorless cells may be a general mechanism inducing phenotypic heterogeneity and controlling population lags in switching environments. This mechanism also illustrates how gene expression noise can turn even a simple sensory gene circuit into a bet hedging module and underlines the profound role of gene expression noise in regulatory responses.

Indexed as

BacteriaEnvironmentEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene-Environment InteractionGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic FitnessGlucoseLac OperonLactosePhenotypeEscherichia coli ProteinsGlucoseLactose

Identifiers

PMID33270631
PMCPMC7738171
OpenAlexW3109401381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.