Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33270624›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Accurate prediction of kinase-substrate networks using knowledge graphs.

Vít Nováček, Gavin McGauran, David Matallanas, Adrián Vallejo Blanco, Piero Conca, Emir Muñoz, Luca Costabello, Kamalesh Kanakaraj, Zeeshan Nawaz, Brian Walsh and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prediction of Kinase-Substrate Associations Using The Functional Landscape of Kinases and Phosphorylation Sites.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Phosphoproteomics data-driven signalling network inference: Does it work?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Vít NováčekData Science Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-6043
Gavin McGauranSystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5427-4697
David MatallanasSystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2360-3141
Adrián Vallejo BlancoSystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Piero ConcaFujitsu Ireland Ltd., Co. Dublin, Ireland.
Emir MuñozData Science Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0089-8135
Luca CostabelloFujitsu Ireland Ltd., Co. Dublin, Ireland.
Kamalesh KanakarajData Science Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.
Zeeshan NawazData Science Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8107-337X
Brian WalshData Science Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8640-2187
Sameh K MohamedData Science Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2659-2406
Pierre-Yves VandenbusscheFujitsu Ireland Ltd., Co. Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-6109
Colm J RyanSystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2750-9854
Walter KolchSystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Dirk FeySystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5558-0167
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphorylation of specific substrates by protein kinases is a key control mechanism for vital cell-fate decisions and other cellular processes. However, discovering specific kinase-substrate relationships is time-consuming and often rather serendipitous. Computational predictions alleviate these challenges, but the current approaches suffer from limitations like restricted kinome coverage and inaccuracy. They also typically utilise only local features without reflecting broader interaction context. To address these limitations, we have developed an alternative predictive model. It uses statistical relational learning on top of phosphorylation networks interpreted as knowledge graphs, a simple yet robust model for representing networked knowledge. Compared to a representative selection of six existing systems, our model has the highest kinome coverage and produces biologically valid high-confidence predictions not possible with the other tools. Specifically, we have experimentally validated predictions of previously unknown phosphorylations by the LATS1, AKT1, PKA and MST2 kinases in human. Thus, our tool is useful for focusing phosphoproteomic experiments, and facilitates the discovery of new phosphorylation reactions. Our model can be accessed publicly via an easy-to-use web interface (LinkPhinder).

Indexed as

Computer SimulationHumansPhosphorylationProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein KinasesSignal TransductionSubstrate SpecificityProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID33270624
PMCPMC7738173
OpenAlexW3108149956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.