ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020
Development and Validation of Predictive Models for Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in China.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2022Trial
- Development and validation of an improved prediction model for vaginal birth after previous cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study of a Chinese population.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Models for predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Association of medical comorbidities and cardiovascular disease with toxicity and survival among patients receiving checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2023Article
- Maternal circulating metabolic biomarkers and their prediction performance for gestational diabetes mellitus related macrosomia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Mechanical ventilation characteristics and their prediction performance for the risk of moderate and severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants with gestational age <30 weeks and birth weight <1,500 g.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate of delivery by cesarean section is rising in China, where vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is in its early stages. There are no validated screening tools to predict VBAC success in China. The objective of this study was to identify the variables predicting the likelihood of successful VBAC to create a predictive model. MATERIAL AND METHODS This multicenter, retrospective study included 1013 women at ≥28 gestational weeks with a vertex singleton gestation and 1 prior low-transverse cesarean from January 2017 to December 2017 in 11 public tertiary hospitals within 7 provinces of China. Two multivariable logistic regression models were developed: (1) at a first-trimester visit and (2) at the pre-labor admission to hospital. The models were evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and internally validated using k-fold cross-validation. The pre-labor model was calibrated and a graphic nomogram and clinical impact curve were created. RESULTS A total of 87.3% (884/1013) of women had successful VBAC, and 12.7% (129/1013) underwent unplanned cesarean delivery after a failed trial of labor. The AUC of the first-trimester model was 0.661 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.712), which increased to 0.758 (95% CI: 0.715-0.801) in the pre-labor model. The pre-labor model showed good internal validity, with AUC 0.743 (95% CI: 0.694-0.785), and was well calibrated. CONCLUSIONS VBAC provides women the chance to experience a vaginal delivery. Using a pre-labor model to predict successful VBAC is feasible and may help choose mode of birth and contribute to a reduction in cesarean delivery rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.