Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33270474›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Vaccine safety - is the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine any different?

Noam Tau, Dafna Yahav, Daniel Shepshelovich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noam TauDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0849-1708
Dafna YahavSackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3181-9791
Daniel ShepshelovichSackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9145-618X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines have changed modern medicine, and are a mainstay in reducing morbidity and mortality from infections. Our research group recently published a study in which we found that vaccines approved by the US Food and Drugs Administration were safe with few clinically important post-approval adverse effects. The current COVID-19 pandemic presents regulators with the unprecedented challenge of balancing a public demand for the rapid development and approval of a safe and effective SARS-CoV-2 vaccine without compromising the strict pre-marketing requirements used for previous vaccines. Here, we review the approval process and safety profiles of FDA approved vaccines and discuss some of the challenges currently facing the FDA regarding the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine approval.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesPatient SafetyCOVID-19Drug ApprovalHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19FDAsafetySARS-CoV-2VaccineVAERS

Identifiers

PMID33270474
PMCPMC8078670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.