ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2020
Use of Machine Learning Approaches in Clinical Epidemiological Research of Diabetes.
Review in Current diabetes reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging innovations in ophthalmic drug delivery for diabetic retinopathy: a translational perspective.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in fundus photography for type 2 diabetes: a scoping review of systemic biomarkers and multi-organ risk prediction.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Heterogeneity in associations between food insecurity and diabetes outcomes.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Machine Learning Model Performance in Diabetic Foot Ulcer: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- GABP Promotes Mesangial Cell Proliferation and Renal Fibrosis Through GLI1 in Diabetic Nephropathy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning for health disparities: type 2 diabetes in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integration of peripheral blood-based systemic inflammatory indices and retinal imaging using interpretable machine learning for predicting anti-VEGF treatment response in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Quality, Usability, and Effectiveness of mHealth Apps and the Role of Artificial Intelligence: Current Scenario and Challenges.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Review
- Metabolic and Genetic Markers Improve Prediction of Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Nested Case-Control Study in Chinese.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022Article
- Improving Machine Learning Diabetes Prediction Models for the Utmost Clinical Effectiveness.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- TyGIS: improved triglyceride-glucose index for the assessment of insulin sensitivity during pregnancy.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2022Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Diabetes Mellitus Care: A SWOT Analysis.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewMachine learning approaches-which seek to predict outcomes or classify patient features by recognizing patterns in large datasets-are increasingly applied to clinical epidemiology research on diabetes. Given its novelty and emergence in fields outside of biomedical research, machine learning terminology, techniques, and research findings may be unfamiliar to diabetes researchers. Our aim was to present the use of machine learning approaches in an approachable way, drawing from clinical epidemiological research in diabetes published from 1 Jan 2017 to 1 June 2020. RECENT
findingsMachine learning approaches using tree-based learners-which produce decision trees to help guide clinical interventions-frequently have higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional regression models for risk prediction. Machine learning approaches using neural networking and "deep learning" can be applied to medical image data, particularly for the identification and staging of diabetic retinopathy and skin ulcers. Among the machine learning approaches reviewed, researchers identified new strategies to develop standard datasets for rigorous comparisons across older and newer approaches, methods to illustrate how a machine learner was treating underlying data, and approaches to improve the transparency of the machine learning process. Machine learning approaches have the potential to improve risk stratification and outcome prediction for clinical epidemiology applications. Achieving this potential would be facilitated by use of universal open-source datasets for fair comparisons. More work remains in the application of strategies to communicate how the machine learners are generating their predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.