Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33270163›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2020

[Routine high-throughput targeted sequencing of lymphoproliferative diseases : Clinical utility and challenges].

T Menter, S Dirnhofer, A Tzankov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T MenterPathologie, Institut für Medizinische Genetik und Pathologie, Universitätsspital Basel, Universität Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 40, 4031, Basel, Schweiz. thomas.menter@usb.ch.
S DirnhoferPathologie, Institut für Medizinische Genetik und Pathologie, Universitätsspital Basel, Universität Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 40, 4031, Basel, Schweiz.
A TzankovPathologie, Institut für Medizinische Genetik und Pathologie, Universitätsspital Basel, Universität Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 40, 4031, Basel, Schweiz.
University of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to other tumour entities such as lung carcinoma, melanoma or gynaecological and gastrointestinal tumours, the routine application of mutation analyses using high-throughput sequencing via next-generation sequencing (NGS) has not yet been widely established in haematopathology, especially not in lymphomas.Here we describe our experience with the use and routine implementation of a lymphoma NGS panel primarily developed for research purposes.In addition to a discussion of the steps necessary for transferring such a panel into the routine framework of an accredited institute, we show by the comprehensive workup of 80 investigations and the presentation of several case studies how the panel was able to guide us to the correct diagnosis and how it also provided clinicians with indications for possible tailored therapy options.Even if NGS does not (yet) have to be routinely applied in lymphoma diagnostics for every case, a respectively dedicated NGS panel offers the advantage of having an additional option in the case of difficult differential diagnostic considerations or uncertainties as well as at the request of the treating oncologist to identify potential targets for tailored treatment of the patients.

Indexed as

Lymphoproliferative DisordersDNA Mutational AnalysisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLung NeoplasmsMelanomaMutationDifferential diagnosisLymphomaMutationsNext generation sequencingSequencing

Identifiers

PMID33270163
OpenAlexW3107705715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.