ReviewDer Pathologe2020
[Routine high-throughput targeted sequencing of lymphoproliferative diseases : Clinical utility and challenges].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In contrast to other tumour entities such as lung carcinoma, melanoma or gynaecological and gastrointestinal tumours, the routine application of mutation analyses using high-throughput sequencing via next-generation sequencing (NGS) has not yet been widely established in haematopathology, especially not in lymphomas.Here we describe our experience with the use and routine implementation of a lymphoma NGS panel primarily developed for research purposes.In addition to a discussion of the steps necessary for transferring such a panel into the routine framework of an accredited institute, we show by the comprehensive workup of 80 investigations and the presentation of several case studies how the panel was able to guide us to the correct diagnosis and how it also provided clinicians with indications for possible tailored therapy options.Even if NGS does not (yet) have to be routinely applied in lymphoma diagnostics for every case, a respectively dedicated NGS panel offers the advantage of having an additional option in the case of difficult differential diagnostic considerations or uncertainties as well as at the request of the treating oncologist to identify potential targets for tailored treatment of the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.