Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33270156›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2020

In vivo comparison of braided (Accero) and laser-cut intracranial stents (Acclino, Credo): evaluation of vessel responses at subacute and mid-term follow-up in a rabbit model.

Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus, Toshiki Tomori, Stefanie Krajewski, Philipp Dietrich, Andreas Simgen, Umut Yilmaz, Christoph Brochhausen, Mara Kießling, Wolfgang Reith, Giorgio Cattaneo

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety and efficacy of the fourth-generation Acandis Acclino flex plus stent for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ruben Mühl-BenninghausDepartment of Neuroradiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany. ruben.mbe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1785-2675
Toshiki TomoriDepartment of Neuroradiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Stefanie KrajewskiDepartment of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany.
Philipp DietrichDepartment of Neuroradiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Andreas SimgenDepartment of Neuroradiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Umut YilmazDepartment of Neuroradiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Christoph BrochhausenDepartment of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Mara KießlingDepartment of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Wolfgang ReithDepartment of Neuroradiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Giorgio CattaneoInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Saarland University · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEUniversity of Stuttgart · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie ZF4063703 AJ8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate in vivo two stent technologies, with particular emphasis on thrombogenicity and inflammatory vessel remodeling processes. The micro-stents tested in this study were developed for intracranial aneurysm treatment. In our study twelve, New Zealand white rabbits were divided into two groups: 18 laser-cut stents (LCS) and 18 braided stents (BS) were impanated without admiration of antiplatelet medication. Three stents were implanted into each animal in the common carotid artery, subclavian artery, and abdominal aorta. Digital subtraction angiography was performed before and after stent implantation and at follow-up for the visualization of occurring In-stent thromboembolism or stenosis. The Stents were explanted for histopathological examination at two different timepoints, after 3 and 28 days. Angiographically neither in-stent thrombosis nor stenosis for both groups was seen. There was a progressive increase in the vessel diameter, which was more pronounced for BS than for LCS. We detected a higher number of thrombi adherent to the foreign material on day 3 for BS. On day 3, the neointima was absent, whereas the complete formation observed was on day 28. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the thickness of the neointima. The in vivo model of our study enabled the evaluation of blood and vessel reactions for two different stent technologies. Differences in vessel dimension and tissue around the stents were observed on day 28. Histological analysis on day 3 enabled the assessment of thrombotic reactions, representing an important complementary result in long-term studies.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisSelf Expandable Metallic StentsStentsAngiographyAnimalsAortaAorta, AbdominalCarotid Artery, CommonCerebrovascular CirculationConstriction, PathologicIntracranial AneurysmLasersMaterials TestingModels, AnimalNeointimaPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsIn vivo comparison of braided and laser-cut stentsNeointimaThromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID33270156
PMCPMC7716819
OpenAlexW3107499465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.